|
1 CD -
8.553654 - (p) & (c) 1998
|
|
COMPLETE
WORKS FOR PIANO FOUR HANDS AND TWO PIANOS -
Volume 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Johannes BRAHMS
(1833-1897) |
Sonata in F minor,
Op. 34 b - (version for 2 pianos 1864)
|
|
42' 54" |
|
|
- Allegro non troppo
|
15' 18" |
|
1 |
|
- Andante, un poco
adagio
|
10' 15" |
|
2 |
|
- Scherzo: Allegro |
7' 11" |
|
3 |
|
- Finale: Poco
sostenuto - Allegro non troppo - Presto, non
troppo
|
10' 01" |
|
4 |
|
Variations on a
Theme by Joseph Haydn, Op. 56 b -
(version for 2 pianos 1873)
|
|
18' 26" |
|
|
- Chorale St. Antoni:
Andante
|
2' 19" |
|
5 |
|
- Variation 1:
Andante con moto
|
1' 13" |
|
6 |
|
- Variation 2: Vivace |
1' 05" |
|
7 |
|
- Variation 3: Con
moto |
1' 22" |
|
8 |
|
- Variation 4:
Andante |
2' 18" |
|
9 |
|
- Variation 5: Poco
presto |
0' 55" |
|
10 |
|
- Variation 6: Vivace |
1' 17" |
|
11 |
|
- Variation 7:
Grazioso |
2' 59" |
|
12 |
|
- Variation 8: Poco
presto |
1' 00" |
|
13 |
|
- Finale: Andante
|
3' 59" |
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
Silke-Thora MATTHIES | Christian
KÖHN, pianoforti
|
|
|
|
|
|
Luogo
e data di registrazione |
|
Clara
Wieck Auditorium, Sandhausen
(Germania) - 9-11 settembre 1996 |
|
|
Registrazione:
live / studio
|
|
studio |
|
|
Producer
& Engineer |
|
Günter
Appenheimer |
|
|
Cover |
|
Early
Spring in Vienna Woods by Ferdinand
Georg Waldmüller
(Archive für Kunst und Geschichte,
Berlin)
|
|
|
Edizione
CD |
|
NAXOS |
8.553654 | (1 CD) | durata 1h 01' 30"
| (p) & (c) 1998 | DDD |
|
|
Note |
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
Johannes
Brahms was born in Hamburg in
1833, the son of a double-bass
player and his much older wife,
a seamstress, His childhood was
spent in relative poverty, and
his early studies in music, as a
pianist rather than as a
string-player, developed his
talent to such an extent that
there was talk of touring as a
prodigy at the age of eleven. It
was Eduard Marxsen who gave him
a grounding in the technical
basis of composition, while the
boy helped his family by playing
the piano in dockside taverns.
In 1851 Brahms met the émigré
Hungarian violinist Reményi, who
introduced him to Hungarian
dance music that had a later
influence on his work Two years
later he set out in his company
on his first concert tour, their
journey taking them, on the
recommendation of the Hungarian
violinist Joachim, to Weimar,
where Franz Liszt held court and
might have been expected to show
particular favour to a
fellow-countryman. Reményi
profited from the visit, but
Brahms, with a lack of tact that
was later accentuated, failed to
impress the Master. Later in the
year, however, he met the
Schumanns, through Joachim's
agency. The meeting was a
fruitful one.
In 1850 Schumann had taken up
the offer from the previous
incumbent, Ferdinand Hiller, of
the position of municipal
director of music in Düsseldorf,
the first official appointment
of his career and the last. Now
in the music of Brahms he
detected a promise of greatness
and published his views in the
journal he had once edited, the
Neue Zeitschrift für Musik,
declaring Brahms the
long-awaited successor to
Beethoven. In the following year
Schumann, who had long suffered
from intermittent periods of
intense depression, attempted
suicide. His final years, until
his death in 1856, were to be
spent in an asylum, while Brahms
rallied to the support of
Schumann's wife, the gifted
pianist Clara Schumann, and her
young family, remaining a firm
friend until her death in 1896,
shortly before his own in the
following year.
Brahms had always hoped that
sooner or later he would be able
to return in triumph to a
position of distinction in the
musical life of Hamburg. This
ambition was never fulfilled.
Instead he settled in Vienna,
intermittently from 1863 and
definitively. In 1869,
establishing himself there and
seeming to many to fulfil
Schumann's early prophecy. In
him his supporters, including,
above all, the distinguished
critic and writer Eduard
Hanslick, saw a true successor
to Beethoven and a champion of
music untrammelled by
extra-musical associations, of
pure music, as opposed to the
Music of the Future promoted by
Wagner and Liszt, a path to
which Joachim and Brahms both
later publicly expressed their
opposition.
As a composer Brahms was at
first diffident, casting and
recasting what he wrote and
discarding much, well aware of
the challenge that Beethoven had
left to posterity and of the
growing expectations of those
who followed Schumann in their
expression of confidence in his
ability. In September 1862 he
arrived in Vienna for the first
time, delighting in what he
found. This, after all, was the
city that had nurtured Haydn,
Mozart, Beethoven and Schubert,
and as such held both a
fascination and a challenge.
Among compositions that he took
with him was a String
Quintet in F minor,
scored, as Schubert's great C
major Quintet had been,
for two violins, viola and two
cellos. Ready, however, to hear
the advice of friends, he
accepted the expert opinion of
the violinist Joachim, who told
him that the quintet was too
difficult. The next step was to
recast the work and the quintet
was now redrafted as a sonata
for two pianos. It was on the
advice of Clara Schumann, who
regarded this as a merely
temporary measure, that the
work, in 1864, took its final
shape as the Piano Quintet
in F minor, Opus 34, the
form in which it is now
generally most familiar. The String
Quintet was lost, although
it has since been restored,
while the Sonata in F minor
for two pianos, Opus 34b,
had its first and very
successful performance in Vienna
in 1864 On this occasion it was
performed by the composer
together with the young virtuoso
Carl Tausig, a pupil of Liszt in
Weimar. Tausig had been born in
Warsaw in 1841 and been taught
by his father, himself a pupil
of Thalberg. In 1862 he had
settled, for the moment, in
Vienna and it was Tausig who, in
early 1864, had brought about
the first and only meeting
between Brahms and Wagner.
The Sonata in F minor
was dedicated also in this
version to Princess Anna of
Hesse, whom Brahms had met at
Lichtenthal while staying there
with Clara Schumann and who had
presented him with the autograph
of Mozart's Symphony in G
minor. The first movement
opens with the familiar and
ominous principal theme,
unharmonized, as in the Quintet
version. It is the second piano
that then is able to add
percussive effect to the
following string chords, while
the first player is entrusted
with what was later still given
to the piano. The second subject
is in the remote key of C sharp
minor, the enharmonic equivalent
of D flat minor, admitting here
some of those cross-rhythms
which are a continuing feature
of Brahms's writing. The
repetition of the exposition is
followed, duly, by the central
development of the material in
music of generally mounting
intensity where the technical
needs of the percussive piano
call for treatment different
from that of the strings in the
later version, in which the
strings can sustain volume. In
the recapitulation, after the
return of the first subject, the
second is given the key of F
sharp minor, an even clearer
indication of its remoter
harmonic nature. There is a
relaxation into a gentle F
major, before the original tonic
minor key is forcefully
re-asserted.
The A flat major Andante
of the sonata frames a central
section in E major, with the
returning outer theme
re-arranged in its textures. The
C minor Scherzo allows,
in its two-piano version,
additions to its opening
syncopation, before moving into
duple metre and then into a
triumphant march. A place is
found for contrapuntal treatment
of the second of these three
elements, a distinct reference
to the second element of the
principal subject of the first
movement. The Trio, at
the heart of the movement, is in
a gentle C major. The last
movement starts imitatively,
once more in F minor, the Poco
sostenuto introductory bars soon
leading to an Allegro non
troppo in which the second
piano has the theme later to be
given to the cello. Secondary
material appears, in what seems
at first to be the key of C, now
marked un pochettino più
animato and in the two-piano
version legato ed espressivo, a
little livelier, smooth and
expressive. The movement
advances to a final coda, marked
Presto, non troppo, at
first in C sharp minor, before
the original key is restored in
a forceful ending.
Wagner had grudgingly suggested
that there might still be some
life in the old form of thematic
variations, in the right hands,
when Brahms played to him his
piano Variations on a Theme
of Handel, at their
meeting in 1864. Brahms showed
very considerable skill in his
handling of the form, to which
he finally returned in 1873 with
his Variations on a Theme by
Joseph Haydn. The theme in
question is that of the
so-called St. Anthony
Chorale, found in a Feld-Partita
for eight wind instruments, once
attributed to Haydn but now
thought to be the work of Ignaz
Pleyel. The theme itself seems
to have been a pilgrims' hymn
and the first version of the
variations by Brahms was that
for two pianos, subsequently
orchestrated. He had spent the
summer of 1873 at Tutzing, near
Munich, where he worked on the Variations,
while completing his two Opus
51 String Quartets. The
autumn brought a
misunderstanding with Joachim,
who, thinking he understood his
friend's mind on the subject,
had acquiesced in the omission
of a performance of Brahms's German
Requiem at the Schumann
Festival in Bonn. Brahms, who
thought the work should have
been performed, however
ambiguous his initial response
had been, took offence,
including Clara Schumann in his
displeasure Matters were
smoothed over, Brahms attended
the festival and Clara was able
to record in her diary that she
had played over the Haydn
Variations with the
composer and found them quite
wonderful. She played the work
at her last concert appearance,
in Frankfurt in 1891, when the
programme makes it clear that
the Variations were now more
familiar in their orchestral
form.
Brahms states the theme at the
outset, in purely classical
terms, moving at once, in the
first of the eight variations,
into a contrast of rhythms, the
first piano adding a triplet
counterpoint to the altered
theme. There is a lively B flat
minor second variation and a
gently moving third, followed by
a B flat minor Andante
in 3/8. The fifth variation, in
the major key once more, at
first allows passages of thirds
to the first piano, over the
insistent repetitions of the
second, before roles are
reversed. The sixth version is
marked Vivace, to be followed,
in traditional style, by a
graceful Andante in Siciliano
rhythm. There is a B flat minor
eighth variation in which the
first piano enters with an
inversion of the second, with
subsequent canonic imitation,
and the whole set ends with a passacaglia,
in which a five-bar ground,
derived from the theme, is
repeated, allowing even further
variations of the material above
and around it.
Keith Anderson
|
|