|
1 CD -
8.43777 ZS - (c) 1987 |
 |
1 LP -
SAWT 9533-B - (p) 1968
|
|
BLOCKFLÖTENKONZERTE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Antonio
VIVALVI
(1675-1741) |
Concerto
in C minor for Recorder (in f'), strings
and basso continuo (F. VI/11) |
|
10' 20" |
|
A1
|
|
- Allegro non molto
|
4' 44" |
|
1 |
|
|
- Largo |
2' 05" |
|
2 |
|
|
- (Presto) |
3' 49" |
|
3 |
|
Giuseppe
SAMMARTINI
(1693-c.-1750) |
Concerto
in F major for Recorder (in c" - "fifth
flute"), strings and basso continuo |
|
13' 20" |
|
A2 |
|
-
Allegro
|
4' 29" |
|
4 |
|
|
- Siciliano |
4' 59" |
|
5 |
|
|
- Allegro assai |
4' 06" |
|
6 |
|
Georg
Philipp TELEMANN
(1681-1767) |
Concerto
in C major for Recorder (in f'), strings
and basso continuo |
|
16' 00" |
|
B1 |
|
- Allegretto |
3' 57" |
|
7 |
|
|
-
Allegro
|
3' 43" |
|
8 |
|
|
-
Andante |
4' 19" |
|
9 |
|
|
-
Tempo di Menuet
|
4' 21" |
|
10 |
|
Jean-Jacques
NAUDOT
(d. 1762?) |
Concerto
in G major for Recorder (in f'), 2
violins and basso continuo |
|
10' 11" |
|
B2 |
|
- Allegro |
4' 27" |
|
11 |
|
|
- Adagio |
3' 00" |
|
12 |
|
|
- Allegro |
2' 58" |
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Frans
Brüggen, Blockflöte
|
CONCENTUS
MUSICUS WIEN (mit
Originalinstrumenten) |
Nikolaus Harnoncourt
und Frans Brüggen, Leitung |
|
|
|
|
Luogo
e data di registrazione |
|
Casino
Zögernitz, Vienna (Austria) -
27/28 Febrauary 1968
|
|
|
Registrazione:
live / studio |
|
studio |
|
|
Producer |
|
Wolf
Erichson
|
|
|
Prima Edizione
LP |
|
Telefunken
- SAWT 9533-B - (1 LP) - durata
51' 35" - (p) 1968 - Analogico
|
|
|
Edizione
"Reference" CD
|
|
Tedec
- 8.43777 ZS - (1 CD) - LC 3706 -
durata 51' 35" - (c) 1987 - AAD |
|
|
Cover |
|
Detail
aus einem barocken Bilderrahmen
mit König David, Musen, Tugenden
und Lastem. Buchsbaumholz /
Holland gegen 1670, mit
freundlicher Genehmigung des
Museums für Kunst und Gewerbe,
Hamburg
|
|
|
Note |
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
The
period in which the
concertos on our
disc originated was
no longer the heyday
of recorder playing
and recorder music.
While the instrument
witnessed a further
late flowering in
chamber music
shortly after 1700,
particularly in
England, France and
Italy, in solo
concertos it
produced only a
rearguard action
oppressed both by
the violin as the
new solo instrument
of expression par
excellence and
by the transverse
flute, whose tone
was on the one hand
more brilliant and
on the other equally
"soulful" - even
though the recorder
continued to remain
a possibility as an
alternative
instrument in works
avaible for the
maximum variety of
resources. That the
solo concerto bad
originated shortly
before 1700 as a
violin concerto and
above all had gained
ground as a violin
concerto also
contributed to the
recorder's inability
to secure a
permanent footing -
the more the
concerto developed
and found favour as
the representative
form of utterance
the more the shaping
of the solo part
followed the
technical and
expressive
possibilities of the
stringed instrument.
Thus the number of
surviving concertos
which prescribe a
member of the
recorder family as
solo instruments is
extremely small, and
especially small in
Italy, the
stronghold of the
early violin
concerto, whereas in
Paris and London, as
well as in Germany,
the springs flowed
somewhat more
strongly. The
selection on the
present disc
reflects this
proportion. At the
same tima it shows
that a numerically
sparse tradition is
not necerrarily
associated with any
inferior quality in
the works handed
down. In the hands
of an important the
recorder, even in
the solo concerto of
the early 18th
century, spoke with
an attractive voice
unmistakably its
own.
The resourcefulness
in ideas and, above
all, the
astonmishing tonal
imagination which
never let Vivaldi's
concertos appear
monotonus and
mechanical, for all
the formal
similarity of most
of his works, are
particularly
impressively seen in
the recorder
concerto in C minor
(P. 440) against a
background of a
still very "baroque"
style. In the
sequence and form of
the movements, the
three-movement work
conforms to
Vivaldi's normal
solo concerto form;
but within these
almost conventional
limits the
composer's
imagination can
expand all the more
freely. It does so
particularly in the
display of an
unusual virtuosity
in the flute part
and in the enjoyment
of colour in the
soli, which almost
consistently are
accompained only by
the upper strings
(without continuo)
or, more seldom, by
the continuo alone,
so that structural
contrast between
tutti and soli is
underlined by the
instrumentation, and
the soli take on a
peculiarly clear,
almost sparkling,
tonal character
which is till more
intensified through
the consistently
high register, the
virtuosic agility
and the
characteristic tone
of the recorder.
Instrumentation and
tone colour as
elements of musical
structure had been
far removed from
high-baroque
concerto; Vivaldi
has here become a
pioneer of a new
style which was
eventually to find
its fulfilment in
Mozart's orchestral
writing. On the
other hand, in this
concerto it is
precisely the
"baroque" - for
Vivaldi seimply the
conventional -
elements which
cannot be
overlooked, and the
bridging of these
and the
forward-looking
passages is not the
least charm of the
work.
Between baroque and
early classic, if in
a less pronunced
style, also stands
the F major concerto
of Giuseppe
Sammartini. The
brother of the more
famous Giovanni
Battista Sammartini
was one of the many
Italian instrumental
composers of the
18th century who
sought their fortune
north of the Alps:
after he had fist
worked as an oboist
in Milan, he went in
1729 to London,
where he became
chamber music
director to the
Prince of Wales, and
where he died around
1750 or 51. In form
his concerto,
particurarly the
first movement,
clearly reveals the
Vivaldi concerto
type, though the
distinction between
soli and tutti has
grown a little
stronger than there:
in inflection and
even in details of
its invention it is
nevertheless a
typical "London"
work from
Handel and
Geminiani's circle.
The first movement
shows this with its
march-like
character, as does
the finale, which
for all its vivacity
and elegance is no
Italian dance
movement lightly
thrown in but, in
its relatively
compact and careful
workmanship, still
preserves something
of the dignity of
the great baroque
concertos of
Corelli's
successors. But the
core of the work is
the middle movement,
an elegiac siciliano
in the style of
Handel, which far
surpasses the
elegant dignity of
the outer movements.
Telemann's C major
flute concertos is
cast from a quite
different mould: it
has been preserved
for us from the
contents of the
Darmstadt court
library and so
perhaps belongs to
the composer's
Frankfurt period.
The sequence of
movements already
reveals that
Telemann's model is
not the Italian solo
concerto but rather
the late-baroque
chamber sonata, and
this impression is
confirmed by the
movement structure
in which the strong
alternation of tutti
and soli gives way
to the interplay of
short concertante
and thematic
passages, the
exceptional
exhibitionist
virtuosity of the
solo instrument to a
thematic
dialoguebetween solo
and orchestra. The
first movement, with
its rapturous,
seemingly
inexhaustible
flowing cantilena,
its string of
sequences over long
bass pedalpoints and
its dialogue of
"nature" flute
motives and
pizzicato-string
idyllic and bucolic
moods, testifies
that in its thematic
concentration and
finish it is
entirely in the
style of chamber
music, not of a
concerto. The second
movement, Allegro,
with its vital
syncopated rhythm,
turns the sweet
pastoral mood of the
first to a rubuster
rusticity. The grave
A minor Andante,
structurally very
similar to the first
movement and, like
it, given a
chamber-music
refinement, exploits
the attraction of
constant major-minor
alternations. The
finale, in the form
of a broad binary
suite-movement,
stresses still more
strongly the
virtuosity of the
solo instrument and
reverts to the
character of the
second movement,
while at the same
time increasing its
ehythmic vitality to
a genuine polonaise
style.
Jean-Jacques
Naudot's flute
concerto introduces
a quite different
sphere - that of the
art of aristocratic
Parisian society.
Here the recorder
became a genre
instrument which
from its tonal
character had a
folk-like, bucolic
aura which it shared
woth the vielle
(which Naudot
himeself played) and
the musette, and
which was as much
enjoyed by Paris
salon society, with
its nostalgic
sentiments, as were
Boucher's bucolic
idylls, which were
the fashion at this
same time. Thus
Naudot's Op. 28
(after 1740), from
wich our concerto is
drawn, was intended
"pour les vieles,
musettes, flûtes
traversière, flûtes
à bec, et hatbois",
which could as
desired take the
upper part. while
the other parts were
allotted to two
violins and
continuo. The
limitation thus
imposed on the upper
part, particularly
in respect of
performance
technique, accords
with the style of
the work: it is the
style not of the
concerto but of the
consort, which could
be played just as
well by solo
chamber-music
performers as
concerted, with
several strings to a
part, and in which
the upper part
hardly ever appeared
alone but mostly in
concertante duet
with the first
violin. The type and
character of the
movements, again
conforms to this
basis; they likewise
are completely
French, and only
seldem show the
influence of Italian
instrumental music.
Thus the first
Allegro certainly
bears Italian traces
in the gestures of
its unison main
subject, but in the
decorative
ornamentation, the
dotted 3/4 rhythm
and the concertante
duets of the flute
and violin entirely
preserves the French
style and its
specific character,
in which are
combined lightly
ceremonious, courtly
elegance and lyrical
simplicity. The
solemn G minor
Adagio is completely
attuned to typically
French rhythms,
chains of suspension
and decorated
sequences, and only
the finale, with its
main subject like a
quotation from
Vivaldi, its
cascades of
semiquavers and its
stretches of chords,
more clearly alludes
to the modern
Italian spirit,
without indeed
renouncing the basic
character of the
Parisian
"divertissement".
Ludwig
Finscher
|
|