|
1 LP
- 2533 377 - (p) 1978
|
 |
7 CD's
- 445 667-2 - (c) 1994 |
|
Geistliche Musik des 15. und
16. Jahrhunderts (Franko-Flämische
Schule) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MOTETTEN
- MOTETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jacob Obrecht
(1450/51-1505) |
|
|
|
|
- Salve regina
- a 6 (AI-AII-AIII [mit Zink] /
TI-TII-B [mit Posaune]) |
Opera omnia,
ed. A. Smijers, Amsterdam 1953
ff. |
|
11' 17" |
A1 |
- Beata es
Maria - a 4, a cappella (AI
/ AII / T / B)
|
Werken van
Jacob Obrecht, ed. J. Wolf,
Leipzig-Amsterdam 1912-1921 |
|
5' 00" |
A2 |
- Salve crux
- a 5, a cappella (A / TI / TII /
TIII / B) |
Opera omnia,
ed. A. Smijers, Amsterdam 1953
ff.
|
|
12' 17" |
A3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Pierre de la Rue
(ca.1460-1518) |
|
|
|
|
- Laudate
Dominum - a 4 (AI mit Zink /
TI mit Posaune / TII mit Posaune /
B mit Dulzian) |
Das Chorwerk
(Nr. 91), Wolfenbüttel 1964, ed.
N. Davison |
|
3' 14" |
B1 |
- Pater de
caelis - a 6 (A / Posaune /
TI / Posaune / TII / Dulzian) |
Motets of
Pierre de la Rue, ed. N.
Davison, Bryn Mawr,
Pennsylvania, 1966 |
|
9' 26" |
B2 |
- Gaude virgos
- a 4, a cappella (A / TI / TII /
B) |
Motets of
Pierre de la Rue, ed. N.
Davison, Bryn Mawr,
Pennsylvania, 1966 |
|
6' 27" |
B3 |
- Salve regina
- a 4, a cappella (AI / AII / T /
B) |
Motets of
Pierre de la Rue, ed. N.
Davison, Bryn Mawr,
Pennsylvania, 1966 |
|
4' 21" |
B4 |
|
|
|
|
PRO CANTIONE ANTIQUA, London |
THE LONDON
CORNETT AND SACKBUT ENSEMBLE |
- Paul Esswood,
Kevin Smith, James Bowman, Counter-Tenor |
- Andrew van der
Beek, Zink und Dulzian |
- James Griffett,
James Lewington, Ian Partridge, Tenor |
- Theresa Caudle,
Michael Laird, Conetts |
- Mark Brown,
Stephen Roberts, Brian Etheridge,
Ian Caddy, David Thomas, Paul
Elliott, Bass |
- Alan Lumsden,
Paul Nieman, Stephen Saunders, Posaune |
|
|
|
Bruno Turner,
Leitung |
|
|
|
|
Luogo
e data di registrazione |
|
Henry Wood
Hall, Trinity Church Square, London
(Inghilterra) - 16-21 febbraio 1977 |
|
|
Registrazione:
live / studio |
|
studio |
|
|
Production |
|
Dr. Andreas
Holschneider |
|
|
Recording
Supervision
|
|
Dr. Gerd
Ploebsch |
|
|
Recording
Engineer |
|
Hans-Peter
Schweigmann |
|
|
Prima
Edizione LP |
|
ARCHIV - 2533
377 - (1 LP - durata 52' 28") - (p) 1978 -
Analogico |
|
|
Prima
Edizione CD |
|
ARCHIV - 445
667-2 - (7 CD's - durata 72' 13", 65' 04",
78' 03", 75' 33", 53' 56", 77' 30" &
66' 38") - (c) 1994 - ADD
CD3 8-10 (Obrecht)
CD4 1-4 (de la Rue)
|
|
|
Cover |
|
"Krönung
Mariens - The Crowning of Mary -
Couronnement de Marie", Brüder Limburg,
Les très riches heures de Jean, Duc de
Berry
Musée Condé, Chantilly - Ektachrome:
Giraudon, Paris |
|
|
|
|
The
“unity of a school of composers active
about the period 1430-1560 who
established standard forms of polyphonic
composition, most of them born in the
area on both sides of the present
Franco-Belgian frontier” (Riemann
Musiklexikon), known as the
“Netherlands” or more recently
“Franco-Flemish” School, does not
necessarily signify that this unity was
primarily the result of common
dependence on the leadership of one or
more dominant personalities. Such unity
as existed between the composers of this
group originated rather through their
common roots in the tradition of French
music and frequent contacts With the
music of England and Italy, and despite
all stylistic differences it manifested
itself in the similar use which they
made of musical material, and in their
adoption of similar principles of
construction. In the third volume of his
“Geschichte der Musik” (Breslau, 1868)
August Wilhelm Ambros declared that “the
extremely earnest and conscientious work
of this era which was of such vast
importance in its bearing on the
development of music” originated “on the
established foundations of Gregorian
plainsong and of folksong, the polyphony
being evolved as the result of widely
differing conditions, under which were
produced works of art marked by their
organic perfection and inner unity.”
Jacob Obrecht and Pierre de la Rue
belong, according to the period during
which they lived, to the second of the
three eras of the Franco-Flemish School
as defined by Ambros. As contemporaries
of Josquin, however, they are more often
associated with the older Ockeghem. This
seems appropriate at least in the case
of Pierre de la Rue, who as “Pierchon”
is mentioned in Jean Molinet’s
“Déploration” on the death of Ockeghem
set to music by Josquin; nevertheless
there is not known to have been a
personal pupil relationship between
them. Pierre de la Rue was born at
Tournai, probably about 1460, but
nothing is known about his musical
training. He probably visited Italy
during his early years, and the
remarkable number of his compositions
preserved in the archives of the Papal
Chapel points to a continuing connection
with Rome.
Pierre de la Rue was a singer at the
Court of Burgundy from 1492 until 1516,
and in 1502 and 1506 he accompanied
Philip the Fair on visits to Spain. From
1501 onward he was also a canon of the
Church of Our Lady in Courtrai; he
retired to that town in 1516 and
remained there until his death on the
20th November 1518.
Works which are considered to be
certainly by Pierre de la Rue include 31
Masses, five separate settings of the
Credo and two of the Kyrie, together
with some 30 motets and about the same
number of secular compositions, some of
which were published during his lifetime
in collections issued by Petrucci,
Antico and Junta. After his death sacred
works of his were published only in
Germany (for example the motet Pater
de caelis, published in 1520 by
Wyrsung of Augsburg). The value attached
to his work in Lutheran Germany is
indicated by the existence of his
compositions in the repertoire of many
choirs about the middle of the 16th
century; Luther mentioned him in one of
his table discourses: “Ah, what fine
musici have died in ten years! Josquin,
Petrus Loroe (= La Rue), Finck et multi
alii excellentes”.
Although Pierre de la Rue is regarded
today as the only master of the
15th/16th century “whose work can bear
comparison with that of his contemporary
Josquin” (Riemann Musiklexikon), his
compositions have hitherto remained
almost unknown. The extraordinary
stylistic variety of his works as a
whole still creates difficulties. It is
true that A. W. Ambros singled out as
the principal characteristic of this
music its “earnest grandeur”, but
“within this context the expression and
treatment in different works vary
greatly, while individual compositions
even stand outside it, and in their fine
subtlety suggesting a miniature
painting, in their evident and
successful quest for the sweetest
euphony ... they depart so far from
everything which normally distinguishes
this master that the same creative hand
is scarcely to be recognized.” There is,
however, one distinguishing criterion of
Pierre de la Rue’s style which is not to
be found to the same degree in the works
of his contemporaries - his love of
canonic writing. In this sense the term
canon indicates the way in which
- often to make a point suggested by the
words -- a voice part can give rise to
several others, as well as the more or
less strict imitation of one part by
another or by several others. Thus in
the psalm motet Laudate Dominum
the treble part is imitated by the alto
a fourth lower and by the tenor an
octave lower, as indicated by the
direction “3 ex 1”, while the bass part
is free, merely introducing certain
elements of the canonic melody. The
pattern “3 ex 1” also forms the basis of
the six-voice Pater de caelis.
Here the three-voice canon (tenor, sexta
vox, treble - sung in our recording) is
joined by an “accompanying complex” also
in three parts (alto, quinta vox, bass -
here played by instruments), whose
characteristics and motives are related
to the canonic voices, but which remains
independent and fulfils a primarily
tonal function within the structure of
the work. The motet Guade virgo
is not entirely imitative in
construction, but canonic structures are
combined with differently fashioned
elements; the sound picture is divided
up, and the deliberately changing
density plays a creative part in
generating and inter-relating the
complex elements which ordain the flow
of the music. The second section of the
motet also contains sections of what may
be described as de facto homophony, in
which different kinds of momentum are
avoided, although the individual voices
are still linear in character. The
four-part setting of the Salve
regina impressively demonstrates
Pierre de la Rue’s technique of using a
plainsong melody merely by adopting
certain sequences of intervals from it.
Either the original becomes largely
unrecognizable through ornamentation, or
to the unaltered plainsong melody a
second, ornamented part is added, and
has the effect of preventing the
plainsong quotation from being too
clearly perceptible.
Certain stylistic features in the works
of Jacob Obrecht indicate that this
“brilliant outsider” (Besseler) was
considerably influenced by the creative
technique of the older composer Johannes
Ockeghem - again, this was the result
not of a direct teacher-pupil
relationship but of the adoption and
cross-development of constructive
techniques typical of the
Franco-Filemish School. Born in 1450/51,
possibly during a journey which his
parents made through Sicily (this is
indicated by the words of the motet Mille
quingentis which he composed on
the death of his father), Obrecht was
active in 1479-84 first at
Bergen-op-Zoom, then at Cambrai
Cathedral, but he was dismissed from his
post there in 1485 on account of his
poor control of financial matters and
shortcomings in his treatment of the
choirboys. After holding an appointment
at St. Donatianus in Bruges (1486-91),
then at Notre Dame Cathedral in Antwerp
(1492-96, ended by illness), Obrecht
returned to St. Donatianus in Bruges as
Succentor (1498-1500), but he also had
to relinquish this post on account of
bad health. He made two visits, in
1487/88 and 1504, to the Court of
Ferrara, and during his second stay in
Italy he died there of the plague in
1505.
In contrast to the works of Pierre de la
Rue, Obrecht’s compositions were widely
known and highly regarded during his
lifetime. In 1501 Petrucci published a
volume of five of his Masses in Venice,
and soon after that a second volume
containing five further settings of the
Ordinarium was published by Mewes in
Neu-Angemünde. Other works of his
appeared in almost all early collections
of music by various composers of that
time. As in the case of Pierre de la
Rue, complete settings of the Ordinarium
of the Mass form the major part of
Obrecht’s creative output. Following the
discovery of the Segovia manuscript
(1936) 26 settings of the Mass, together
with some 30 motets and a number of
secular works, have been definitely
identified as being by Obrecht.
The principal distinguishing feature of
Obrecht’s motets is their dependence on
a liturgical cantus firmus, while the
freely imitative style of motet writing
developed by Josquin is to be met with
in only a few of Obrecht’s works. Many
of his compositions make use of several
cantus firmi simultaneously. The first
section of the motet Salve crux,
arbor vitae employs as cantus
firmus the sequence for the feast of the
Exaltation of the Holy Cross “O crux,
lignum triumphale”. This is first
developed twice, then in the second
section of the motet it is treated by
all the voices in imitation. As a new
cantus firmus the quintus presents the
5th Laudes Antiphon for the feast of the
Finding of the Holy Cross: “Per signum
crucis”. In the concluding third section
the first cantus firmus reappears, this
time in different rhythmical values
(tempus perfectum diminutum). This work,
whose length and wealth of structural
material make it probably the most
substantial of all Obrecht’s motets, is
joined by the four-part setting of the
prayer to the Blessed Virgin Beata
es Maria, similar in layout but
more modest. The words of this motet
consist of the Responsory to the Marian
Antiphon “Virgo Galilaea”, the Litaniae
Lauretanae and the “Ave Maria”. In the
first of the two parts the cantus firmus
takes the form of a melody of unknown
origin from the Responsory “Beata es
Maria”, the same melody reappears note
for note in the second part in
conjunction with the beginning of the
“Ave Maria” in the alto part as a
further cantus firmus. Finally the Salve
regina for six voices is based on
the plainsong melody to the Marian
Antiphon from the Compline for the
period from Trinity until Advent.
Through ornamentation it is adapted to
the musical idiom of the work, without
being greatly altered and wholly
integrated into the composition as in
the motet of Pierre de la Rue. Obrecht
set only lines 2, 4, 6 and part of line
7 of the text; this reflects the
practice of antiphonal performance - the
text was often divided up line by line,
sung alternately to the unaccompanied
plainsong melodies and in a polyphonic
setting.
Peter
Kiesewetter
Translator: John Coombs
|
|
|