|
1 LP -
STE 50 265
|
|
CONCERT POUR
L'EMPEREUR AU CHATEAU DE - SCHOENBRUNN |
|
|
|
|
|
DANS LE FRÉMISSEMENT DES CORDES ET
DANS LA SPLENDEUR DES CUIVRES LA SYMPHONIE
NAIT PRÈS DE VIENNE |
|
|
|
|
|
Karl
Georg von Reutter (1708-1772) |
Servizio
di tavola - pour 2 hautbois, 4
trompettes, timbales, cordes et
continuo |
5' 35"
|
A1
|
Georg Matthias Monn
(1712-1750) |
Symphonie
en mi bémol majeur pour 2
hautbois, 2 cors, cordes et
continuo |
11' 11"
|
A2
|
Georg Christoph
Wagenseil (1715-1777) |
Symphonie
en ré majeur pour 2 hautbois, 2
trompettes, timbales, cordes et
continuo |
6' 55"
|
A3
|
Johann Joseph Fux
(1660-1741) |
Suite
No 5 en do majeur, extrait du
"Concentus musico instrumentalis"
pour cordes et continuo |
10' 03"
|
B1
|
Ignaz Holzbauer
(1711-1783) |
Concerto
pour flûte et orchestre à cordes
en ré majeur |
14' 38"
|
B2
|
|
|
|
Franz Koch, Franz Hofmann,
cors |
WIENER
BAROCKENSEMBLE |
|
Jean-Pierre Rampal,
flûte |
Theodor
Guschlbauer, Direction |
|
Josef
Spindler, trompette |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Luogo
e data di registrazione |
|
Wiener
Konzerthaus, Vienna (Austria) -
12/3 aprile & 23 giugno 1965
|
|
|
Registrazione:
live / studio |
|
studio |
|
|
Producer /
Engineer |
|
Hannes
Wawra
|
|
|
Edizione LP |
|
Erato
- STE 50 265 - (1 lp) - durata 48'
22" - (p) 196? - Analogico |
|
|
Note |
|
Details
from Musical Heritage
Society MHS 856
|
|
|
|
|
Au
sud-ouest de
Vienne
(aujourd'hui
au treizième
arrondissement
de cette
ville)
s'éleve le
Chateau de
Schoenbrunn,
ancienne résidence
d'un des
empereurs qui
fut
érigè d'après du
grand architecte
du baroque
autrichien
Johann Bernhard
Fischer von
Erlach, entre
1695 et 1713. A
partir de 1737,
differents
changemments
furent operant à
l'esterieur et à
l'interieur de
l'édifice
d'après le
project de Josef
Emanuel Fischer
von Erlach et
Nikolaus
Facassi. Le part
en style
français fut
tracé par Jean
Trechet
en 1705/1706.
The
selection of
works
presented bere
evokes a
chapter of
Viennese
musical
history whose
importance has
been
perpetually
ignored, as
much by
concert
programming as
by the
recording
industry.
Perhaps the
worldwide
radiance of
Viennese
classicism
which
overshadowed
the evidence
of all which
led up to it
in the
instrumentai
field is the
cause, or
perhaps it is
the present
time which,
despite its
avid interest
in records of
all sorts,
does not
condescend to
concern itself
with this
rather obscure
period of
preparation
and growth.
Whatever the
reason, a gap
in knowledge
of the line of
musical
creativity
between Johann
Sebastian Bach
and Joseph
Haydn
continues to
exist. The
importance of
the school of
Mannheim does
in part fili
this hiatus in
musical
history. But
the orchestrai
style of
Mannheim,
laden with the
clichés in
vogue during
the period and
of a rather
superficial
brilliance
besides, can
account for
only a part of
the evolution
to Haydn. The
other part is
taken by the
school of
Vienna whose
composers,
working
parallel to
their
colleagues at
Mannheim,
created a new
style. This
style is by no
means exempt
from the galant
style then
prized in all
of Europe, but
because of the
geographic and
cultural
position of
the Austrian
capital,
crossroads of
the Italian
and Germanie
civilizations,
it formed the
bridge which
would make
possible the
dawning of the
great period
of classical
art.
Freeing itself
from the old
symphonic
forms of the
Italian
masters, the
new mode of
expression
practiced at
Mannheim and
Vienna is
characterized
by the
composition of
the symphony
in four
movements (a
piece in
minuet form
having been
integrated
into the
scheme in
second or
third
position), by
a great
finesse in the
treatment of
the wind
instruments (a
refìnement
which Haydn
would carry to
its apogee),
by a definite
abandonment of
the basso
continuo,
and, finally,
by the
orchestrai
effects,
celebrated in
their time, of
crescendo,
variation in
the dynamic
values, such
as pianissimi,
fortissimi
and the like.
If the
Mannheim
school
sacrificed
true musical
inspiration to
form by
stressing such
external
effeets as
"sighs,”
"tremolos” and
others, the
Viennese
school
introduced
elements of
popolar
Austrian music
well within
the tradition
of a people
both sensitive
to and
enamoured of
melody.
In order to
give this
evolution an
accurate
survey, we
begin with an
instrumentai
piece in style
stili Baroque,
a Suite by
Johann Joseph
Fux
(1660-1741), Kapellmeister
at the
imperiai court
and author of
a treatise
called
‘'Gradus ad
Parnassum”
(1715) which
was the basis
of studies for
several
generations of
musicians. In
his Suite No.
5 (DTÖ, Voi.
47) Fux is
clearly
inspired by
the French
style of Lully
whose
orchestrai
pieces in
dance form,
instrumentation
and dignified
rhythms gave
rise to
numerous
imitations in
Germany. The
French
influence is
felt
particularly
in the
overture.
Building from
a canon at the
fifth below,
this overture
adopts, in
pronounced
rhythm, the
tripartite
form dear to
Lully: Grave
- Allegro -
Grave.
After an Aria
with a mobile
rhythm and a
fully
developed
melody come
two pieces of
allegorica!
title in the
French manner:
"Aria La
Volage"
with its rapid
fìgures in
sixteenth
notes and the
final movement
entitled "Inégalité,"
a piece in
imitation,
characterized
by perpetuai
changes in
time and
measure.
The Flute
Concerto in D
Major of
Holzbauer
contrasts
strikingly
with the work
which precedes
it. Viennese
by birth,
Ignaz
Holzbauer,
after spending
some years at
the Viennese
Imperial
Opera,
traveled in
Italy, then
spent some
time in
Stuttgart
before
settling in
Mannheim as
concertmaster.
His music,
light, playful
and
admirably
written for
instruments,
breaks
completely
with the modes
of expression
and symbols of
thè Baroque
style.
The "Servizio
di Tavola"
is an
occasionai
work by the
Viennese Karl
Georg Reutter
(1708-1772)
who was Court
Kapellmeister.
Consisting of
four movements
(the minuet
had to be
omitted in
this
recording),
this work is
characteristic
of the taste
of his
contemporaries
for excessive
lushness of
sound and
flashes of
virtuosity.
Stili, let us
take note of
the originai
use of the
solo trumpet
which gives to
the Larghetto
in dynamic
progression
its intensity
of expression.
It is Georg
Matthias Monn
(1717-1750),
whose Concerto
for cello was
brought to
light by
Arnold
Schönberg in
1914, who
seems the
figure of
greatest
interest in
this Viennese
school and the
direct
predecessor of
the great
names of
classical art.
A native of
lower Austria,
he was
organist at
the
Karlskirche in
Vienna. It is
by such works
as his
Symphony in
E-Flat in four
movements that
the line of
evolution
which,
bypassing
Stamitz, leads
to Haydn and
Mozart is
apparent. This
work of
unusual length
shares certain
traits with
Gluck, giving,
in astonishing
manner, a
foretaste of
the spirit and
style of
Mozart (DTÖ,
Vol. 31).
Another
predecessor of
Viennese
classicism is
thr celebrated
piano virtuoso
Georg
Christoph
Wagenseil
(1715-1777)
who was a
pupil of Fux.
Music director
at thr Court
of Maria
Theresa, he is
best known to
posterity for
his meeting
with thr young
Mozart, then
six years of
age, in the
imperial
salons rather
than for his
musical
compositions.
In his
Symphony in D
Major,
originally
conceived as
overture for
his opera La
Clemenza di
Tito, as
in his other
symphonies
(the majority
in three
movements),
the thematic
scheme and
alternation of
motifs seem to
give a
decisive
impetus to the
great
orchestral
form to come.
A.
S.
(Translated
from the
French version
of Françoise
Knaeps by
Constance
Jewett)
|
|