|
9 CD's
- 5 73905 2 - (c) 2000
|
|
ANTON
BRUCKNER (1824-1896) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Symphony No. 1 in
C minor - Linz Version
(Ed. Nowak) |
|
47' 08" |
CD 1 |
- 1. Allegro
|
12' 31" |
|
|
- 2. Adagio |
12' 38" |
|
|
- 3. Scherzo:
Schnell |
9' 02" |
|
|
-
4. Finale: Bewegt, feurig |
12' 57" |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Symphony
No. 2 in C minor - 1877
Version |
|
52' 41" |
CD 2 |
-
1. Moderato |
18' 03"
|
|
|
-
2. Andante
|
14' 57"
|
|
|
-
3. Scherzo: Mässig schnell |
6' 54"
|
|
|
-
4. Finale: Mehr schnell |
12' 46"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Symphony
No. 3 in D minor - 1888-89
Version |
|
55'
13"
|
CD 3 |
-
1. Mehr langsam, misterioso |
20' 50" |
|
|
-
2. Adagio (bewegt) quasi andante |
15' 39" |
|
|
-
3. Ziemlich bewegt |
7' 40" |
|
|
-
4. Allegro |
11' 02" |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Symphony
No. 4 in E flat major "Romantic"
- ed. Nowak |
|
65' 07" |
CD 4 |
-
1. Bewegt, nicht zu schnell |
17' 55" |
|
|
-
2. Andante quasi allegretto |
16' 44" |
|
|
-
3. Scherzo: Bewegt - Trio: Nicht zu
schnell |
10' 01" |
|
|
-
4. Finale: Bewegt, doch nicht zu
schnell |
20' 27" |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Symphony
No. 5 in B flat major - 1878
Version |
|
77' 30" |
CD 5 |
-
1. Introduktion: Adagio - Allegro |
21' 26" |
|
|
-
2. Adagio - Sehr langsam |
19' 16" |
|
|
-
3. Scherzo: Molto vivace - Schnell |
13' 04" |
|
|
-
4. Finale: Allegro moderato |
23' 42" |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Symphony
No. 6 in A major - Original
Version |
|
56' 23" |
CD 6 |
-
1. Maestoso |
16' 11" |
|
|
-
2. Adagio: Sehr feierlich |
18' 36" |
|
|
-
3. Scherzo: Nicht schnell - Trio:
Langsam |
7' 58" |
|
|
-
4. Finale: Bewegt, doch nicht zu
schnell |
13' 35" |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Symphony
No. 7 in E major - ed.
Nowak |
|
69' 27" |
CD 7 |
-
1. Allegro moderato |
21' 05" |
|
|
-
2. Adagio: Sehr feierlich und sehr
langsam |
25' 54" |
|
|
-
3. Scherzo: Sehr schnell - Trio:
Etwas langsamer |
10' 02" |
|
|
-
4. Finale: Bewegt, doch nicht zu
schnell |
12' 25" |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Symphony
No. 8 in C minor |
|
76' 07" |
CD 8 |
-
1. Allegro moderato
|
13' 55" |
|
|
-
2. Scherzo. Allegro moderato |
14' 00" |
|
|
-
3. Adagio: Feierlich langsam, doch
nicht schleppend |
27' 24" |
|
|
-
4. Finale: Feierlich, nicht schnell |
20' 46" |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Symphony
No. 9 in D minor - ed. Nowak |
|
60' 46" |
CD 9 |
-
1. Feierlich, misterioso |
23' 06" |
|
|
-
2. Scherzo: Bewegt, lebhaft - Trio:
schnell |
9' 58" |
|
|
-
3. Adagio - Langsam, feierlich |
27' 39" |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Staatskapelle
Dresden |
|
Eugen JOCHUM |
|
|
|
|
|
Luogo
e data di registrazione |
|
Lukaskirche,
Dresden (Germania):
- dicembre 1978 (Symphony No. 1)
- luglio 1980 (Symphony No. 2)
- gennaio 1977 (Symphony No. 3)
- dicembre 1975 (Symphony No. 4)
- febbraio & marzo 1980
(Symphony No. 5)
- giugno 1978 (Symphony No. 6)
- dicembre 1976 (Symphony No. 7)
- novembre 1976 (Symphony No. 8)
- gennaio 1978 (Symphony No. 9)
|
|
|
Registrazione:
live / studio |
|
studio |
|
|
Producers |
|
Christfried
Bickenbach (Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5 &
6)
David Mottley (Nos. 4, 7 & 8)
Reimar Bluth (No. 9)
|
|
|
Balance
Engineer |
|
Claus
Strüben |
|
|
Prima Edizione
LP |
|
Eterna
- 8 27 426 - (1 LP) - durata 47'
08" - (p) 1980 - (No. 1)
Eterna - 8 27 531 - (1 LP) -
durata 52' 41" - (p) 1981 - (No.
2)
Eterna - 8 27 138-139 - (2 LP's) -
durata 36' 29" & 18' 42" - (p)
1979 - (No. 3)
Eterna - 8 27 533-534 - (2 LP's) -
durata 34' 39" & 30' 28" - (p)
1982 - (No. 4)
Eterna - 8 27 737-738 - (2 LP's) -
durata 40' 42" & 36' 46" - (p)
1982 - (No. 5)
Eterna - 8 27 535 - (1 LP) -
durata 56' 23" - (p) 1981 - (No.
6)
Eterna - 8 27 537-538 - (2 LP's) -
durata 46' 59" & 22' 27" - (p)
1980 - (No. 7)
Eterna - 8 27 681-682 - (2 LP's) -
durata 27' 55" & 48' 10" - (p)
1979 - (No. 8)
Eterna - 8 27 197 - (1 LP) -
durata 60' 46" - (p) 1982 - (No.
9)
|
|
|
Edizione CD |
|
EMI
Classics - 5 73905 2 - (9 CD's) -
(c) 2000 - ADD |
|
|
Note |
|
Recorded
in co-production with the former
ex-VEB Schallplatten, Berlin |
|
|
|
|
|
BRUCKNER -
Symphonies Nos. 1-9
Anton
Bruckner and his
interpreters
Those who have had the good
fortune to encounter the
composer Anton Bruckner
early in life - Whether
through one of his
symphonies, the Te Deum
one of the three great
Masses - are certain to
explore in detail the life
and works of this creative
being, especially if his
music has moved their inmost
soul more deeply than that
of other great masters. Here
is a composer who who met
life head-on, unerringly
negotiating his way through
the trials and tribulations
of his time, and his
admirers praise him in the
spirit and certainty of "Non
confundar in aeternum", the
triumphant concluding chorus
of his Te Deum.
Bruckner’s road was hard and
fraught with difficulty, and
he had already reached
middle age before he began
to produce one symphonic
masterpiece after another,
but now he was fully mature
and sure of his genius.
Bruckner conceived his First
Symphony when he was
forty-three, an age at which
his mighty predecessors
Mozart and Schubert had long
since departed this world.
He continued to revise it
until the the end of his
life when, ill and with
strength failing, he
constructed the
cathedral-like arching
sounds of his Ninth
Symphony.
It seems almost incredible
to those of us brought up in
the twentieth century that
this symphonic genius, who
united the best of the age
with his art, was fated to
accomplish his life’s work
in a city whose
over-sophisticated society
did not understand him. Even
though Bruckner's symphonies
were beginning to enthuse
audiences elsewhere, the
musical establishment of fin
de siècle Vienna made
his life hard by denying him
a constituency and perhaps
even by despising him. In
contrast to this less than
propitious background,
however, can be set these
now famous words spoken by
the Rector of the University
of Vienna on 7 November 1891
when he conferred an
honorary degree on Bruckner:
"At the point where Science
must cease, where its
unbreachable bounds are set,
there begins the realm of
Art, able to express all
that which remains hidden to
Knowledge. I, Rector
magnificus of the
University of Vienna, bow
down before the
ex-schoolmaster from
Windhaag..."
In order to comprehend the
music of Bruckner, it is not
sufficient merely to
contrast the engaging
humanity of the
schoolteacher's son from
Ansfeld with the elemental
genius of the ‘chosen one’.
A full understanding of his
life’s work involves
examining the religious
ethos behind his
compositions, their ritual
character and the composer’s
intrinsic belief in a living
God - the immutable
expression of a devout soul.
It was not just his final
symphony which Bruckner
dedicated to the Lord - his
whole life was consecrated
to His service. This
singular, illustrious life
came full circle when, on 15
October 1896, he was laid to
rest in a coffin of
shimmering gold beneath the
great organ in the crypt of
his spiritual home, the
seminary church of St
Florian. Now he was forever
united with that regal
instrument which he
commanded as no other.
Bruckner’s music, first
‘discovered' in its complete
originality only in the
twentieth century, is an
intellectual phenomenon
without precedent or sequel
which is revealed through
the scores of his nine
mature symphonies and in the
unique personality of their
creator. In spite of
occasional excursions abroad
- as a much-acclaimed
organist in Nancy, Paris and
London, as a composer in
Munich, Leipzig and Berlin,
or as a visitor to the
Bayreuth Festival - his life
remained bound to his
Austrian homeland, and in
particular to the choir at
the seminary of St Florian,
his spiritual home near the
city of Linz, to which he
would always return. Here he
served as a celebrated
cathedral organist at the
same time as studying under
the renowned teacher of
musical theory Simon
Sechter, who for seven years
taught him the ultimate
mysteries of harmony and
counterpoint, to which
Bruckner applied himself
with fanatical diligence. He
once caused the utmost
astonishment among a
committee of experts at a
final examination by
improvising an elaborate
organ fugue. Afterwards, the
conductor and composer
Johann Herbeck remarked: "It
is he who should have been
examining us!"
Bruckner spent twenty-eight
years of his life in Vienna,
teaching and composing. He
succeeded Sechter at the
conservatory as a teacher of
musical theory and organ,
and later he lectured in a
similar capacity at the
university. The cliquish
nature of the imperial
capital made the life of the
sensitive artist difficult,
yet despite hostility from
the powerful critic and
Wagner opponent Eduard
Hanslick and the
intermittent rejections by
the Vienna Philharmonic,
Bruckner did not allow his
creative energies to be
curtailed. He always bounced
back from the deepest
despondency - for instance,
after receiving criticism of
his Eighth Symphony from his
friend the conductor Hermann
Levi, Bruckner rallied to
create his Ninth (and final)
Symphony which he dedicated
to "the dear Lord".
Bruckner’s doctor divulged
the following utterance from
his patient: "You see, I
have already dedicated
symphonies to two temporal
monarchs, to poor King
Ludwig, as a royal patron of
the arts, and to our
illustrious, beloved
Emperor, whom I acknowledge
as the supreme temporal
Majesty; and now I dedicate
my final work to the King of
all kings, the dear Lord,
and hope that He accords me
enough time to complete the
same, and that He will
accept my gift with favour."
The original Bruckner
It was to take a further
half-century before the
European musical world -
which by than had received
Bruckner’s symphonies with
open arms - was able to hear
the composer’s wished-for
original versions. It was
part of the tragedy of
Bruckner’s creative life
that even his closest
friends and students, such
as the brothers Franz and
Joseph Schalk and the
conductor Ferdinand Löwe,
believed that they should
bring their own expertise
into play by lending a
helping hand in such
technical areas as
orchestration. The changes,
which were often conceded
only reluctantly by
Bruckner, did not merely
concern the reworking of
orchestral tone colours in
the spirit of the
Wagner-ideal of the time,
but also encroached on the
symphonies’ uncommon form
and their organ-like dynamic
structure. In addition,
ill-judged cuts were
implemented whenever it was
considered that the average
listener might be overtaxed
by what Bruckner had
originally written. All
these alterations were made
with the intention of
smoothing the path of
Bruckner’s music into the
world, and the results were
generally accepted. The
composer’s admirers only
began to recognise the
problem caused by such
editorial interventions as
recently as 1935, when on
the evening of 2 April
Siegmund von Hausegger
conducted the Ninth Symphony
at the Munich Tonhalle. Two
versions were performed -
the first edition (with
revisions by Löwe), and
Bruckner’s original score.
Since then, the world has
become familiar with
Bruckner`s symphonic colossi
in their original forms.
Indeed, this was the chief
objective of the
International Bruckner
Society, whose complete
edition of the symphonies
began to appear in 1934
through the auspices of the
Wiener
musikwissenschaftlichen
Verlag. Robert Haas
initiated this successful
undertaking, which from 1951
continued under the
direction of Leopold Nowak.
Eugen Jochum, who for many
years availed himself of the
original versions, conducts
the symphonies in these
recordings with the
Staatskapelle Dresden, an
orchestra with a proud
tradition of performing
Bruckner.
Eugen Jochum as Bruckner
conductor
Among the innumerable
conductors who strive for a
faithful interpretation of
Bruckner’s symphonies, Eugen
Jochum was pre-eminent in
the generation that
succeeded such celebrated
figures as Arthur Nikisch,
Hermann Levi, Carl Muck,
Felix Mottl (and later
Wilhelm Furtwängler and
Siegmund von Hausegger). He
was rightly considered the
leading Bruckner exponent of
his day, and his readings of
the nine mature symphonies
are characterised by a
meticulous, balanced
consideration of symphonic
form. The spiritual
foundations and metaphysical
substance of Jochum’s
approach were based on the
affinity this Swabian
conductor felt for the
Austrian symphonist in whom
he had believed so deeply
from an early age.
Eugen Jochum was the second
son of a highly musical
schoolteacher’s family from
Babenhausen in Swabia -
indeed, his two brothers
also went on to become
distinguished musicians. As
a student at the renowned
Benedictine Gymnasium of St
Stephan in Augsburg, Eugen
soon achieved proficiency on
that most quintessentially
Brucknerian of instruments,
the organ. He became
familiar with the many
Baroque organs of Bavaria,
and through long years of
toil was eminently placed to
judge correctly Bruckner's
organ-register technique as
it manifested itself in the
scoring of his symphonies.
From the young Eugen’s
earliest days, Bruckner’s
symphonic works were to
accompany him on his path to
the summit of international
fame. In 1926 the budding
twenty-four-year-old
conductor stood in front of
a great orchestra for the
first time when he directed
Bruckner’s Seventh Symphony
at the Munich Tonhalle. The
Fifth Symphony, too, played
a significant part in
several defining moments of
Jochum’s long career, being
the first work he conducted
for Berlin Radio in 1932,
and also in Hamburg where he
became General Music
Director in 1934. The
symphony also featured in
the programme when he
inaugurated the Bavarian
Radio Symphony Orchestra in
1949. Jochum was known to
all the great European
orchestras as the foremost
Bruckner conductor, and he
also acquired a similar role
among non-European musicians
who until then had remained
relative strangers to
Bruckner’s work. It goes
without saying that during
his long conducting career,
this student of Hausegger
accorded priority to all the
original versions of the
symphonies, and to those
editions authorised by the
composer.
The spirituality of Jochum’s
music-making was most
evident in his love for the
German Romantic tradition,
though he was also an
energetic and successful
champion of certain
contemporary composers such
as Paul Hindemith, Carl Orff
and Werner Egk. For many
people, however, Jochum
remains their undisputed
guide who introduced them to
Bruckner’s musical universe.
As President of the German
branch of the international
Bruckner Society, he also
devoted much of his time to
organising the worldwide
dissemination of Bruckner's
works. His recorded legacy
of the symphonies will
continue along this road,
providing a testament for
generations to come.
In a musical self-portrait
of his youth, Eugen Jochum
spoke of his deeply-felt
relationship with the master
of St. Florian: "I consider
my musical ability as a gift
from above. I wish for it
never to become
self-serving, and I believe
it is my duty to serve and
to act as an instrument for
the thoughts of the great
master, which in their turn
articulate the thoughts of
the Supreme Being, in as
much as they touch upon the
beauty of creation".
Eugen Jochum died in 1987,
and with him a true exponent
of Bruckner’s works.
Karl
Ganzer
(Translation:
Mari Pračkauskas)
|
|