1 CD - 2292-46018-2 - (p) 1990

Franz Joseph Haydn (1732-1809)






Symphonie Nr. 6 D-dur "Le Matin", Hob. I/6
22' 15"
- Adagio - Allegro
6' 06"
1
- Adagio - Andante 7' 23"
2
- Menuetto - Trio 4' 17"
3
- Finale. Allegro 4' 29"
4
Symphonie Nr. 7 C-dur "Le Midi", Hob. I/7
25' 05"
- Adagio - Allegro
8' 09"
5
- Recitativo - Adagio 9' 05"
6
- Menuetto - Trio
3' 37"
7
- Finale. Allegro
4' 14"
8
Symphonie Nr. 8 G-dur "Le Soir", Hob. I/7
24' 51"
- Allegro molto 5' 35"
9
- Andante 11' 41"
10
- Menuetto - Trio 3' 11"
11
- Presto "La Tempesta" 4' 24"
12




 
CONCENTUS MUSICUS WIEN (mit Originalinstrumenten)

Nikolaus Harnoncourt, Leitung

 
Luogo e data di registrazione
Casino Zögernitz, Vienna (Austria) - giugno 1989
Registrazione live / studio
studio
Producer / Engineer
Wolfgang Mohr / Michael Brammann
Prima Edizione CD
Teldec  "Das Alte Werk" - 2292-46018-2 - (1 cd) - 72' 38" - (p) 1990 - DDD
Prima Edizione LP
-

Experimental Music, Anno 1761
Haydn’s trio of "imes of the day” symphonies was written in 1761:  Symphonies no. 5 “Le Matin”, no. 7 “Le Midi” ana no. 8 "Le Soir” show clearly the hand of the twenty-nine-year~old composer. Are these just early attempts of Haydn to find his symphonic feet, then? The insignificant work of a beginner in the genre? Or even a commission obediently executed for his employer, Prince Esterházy? No indeed, they are nothing af the sort! On the contrary, Symphonies nos. 6-8 shaw the unrestrainable delight in experiment at a creative young man who "pulls out all the stops” here. These three symphonies tell an exciting story, which we retell here in leaps and bounds.
On 1st May 1761, Joseph Haydn signed a contract numbering fourteen items, which bound him to the court at Prince Paul Anton Esterházy in Eisenstadt as "domestic officer". Haydn, hitherto under contract ta Count Morzin, could not as yet guess that this decree at 1761 would detain him at the Esterházy court for the best part of thirty years. First of all, he studied - with dn understandable degree at excitement - the new rights and duties attached to his position as the newly-appointed deputy Kapellmeister. He was to make music, ta supervise the musicians, to convey any disagreements with the latter to the Prince for him to decide on; he was expected to keep the singers at their best, to take care of the instruments at the orchestra and provide for the copying of sheet music as required, and, last but not least, - thus the fourth item in his contract - he was to compose whatever was demanded of him at all times:

"4. At the supreme command of His Serene Royal Highness, the Deputy Kapellmeister is required to compose such works of  music as His Highness shall demand; he shall communicate with no-one with regard to these compositions, and shall under no circumstances allow them to be copied, but shall reserve them for the exclusive pleasure of His Highness. In particular: he shall not compose music for anyone else without the prior knowledge and consent of His Highness.”

In present-day terms, Haydn entered into an exclusive contract, and he was bound to secrecy as well. He was rewarded with annual emoluments of 400 Rhineland guilders; and he received a further, non-material reward inthe shape of Prince Paul Anton's passionate love of music - an enthusiasm that was surpassed by that of his successor Prince Nikolaus Esterházy, who became regent in l762. Employers who loved and had an understanding of music, and noble conditions of employment: Haydn had struck lucky. And fortune smiled on him for the rest ot his lang life, towards the end of which he wrote to his biographer Griesinger expressing his gratitude to the Esterházy family:

"My employer was satisfied with everything I produced; I received applause and praise; as the director of the orchestra I was allowed to experiment and to observe what made the desired impression and what detracted from it - i.e. I had the chance to improve, to make additions and cuts, to take risks. I was isolated from the world; there was no-one nearby ta confuse or irritate me, and so I had no choice but to be original. ”

This summing-up of Haydn's career can effortlessly be applied to the “times of the day” symphonies. Here, Haydn certainly did experiment and observe, trying out ditterent effects and juggling with different styles. And in his experimentation, paradoxical as it may sound, he looked towards both the past and the future at the same time. How come? Haydn seems to have been familiar with the basic wisdom of modern creativity psychology, for he knew intuitively that musical progress is borne on the shoulders of composing tradition: the composer who wants to make new discoveries must study the scores of his predecessors first of all, he must be able to learn them and play them himself. But we really ought to be telling the story in the right order: Haydn first set about the task of reorganising the orchestra. He enlarged the modest ranks of Prince Esterházy's existing band (3 violins, l cello, 1 double-bass) by the addition of a flute, two oboes, two bassoons and two horns, and the body of strings was increased in size too. Furthermore, we can assume that the idea ot depicting the times of the day in music came from Prince Esterházy himself; Haydn's predecessor in the post, Gregor Werner, had already composed a "Musical instrumental calendar” circa 1740. And it's also helpful to know that the Prince's collection of scores included a large number of Italian concerti - concerti grossi by Vivaldi, Tartini, Valentini, Albinoni and others testify to the Princes fondness for the italian concertante style. In other words, Haydn had to take two main things into account: the Prince’s personal taste on the one hand, and the new orchestra with solo woodwind on the other. Hence the Symphonies nos. 6-8 are actually concerti in disguise: orchestral tutti alternate throughout with concertino sections, i.e. with solo ensembles. Haydn skilfully combines the expansive orchestral sound developed in the Mannheim School with the traditional development technique of early origin, and arrives at his own specitlc treatment of an “open-work” style of composition via this synthesis of historic and contemporary elements. Another circumstance that influenced the symphonies was the participation of virtuoso soloists in the Esterházy orchestra. Thus the demanding solo parts in Symphony no. 7 were written for the violinist Tomasini, while the tricky cello solos in the finale of Symphony no. 6 and in the adagio of no. 7 were a gesture of affection for Haydn’s friend Weigl, the principal cellist at Esterházy. In tact, it is not going too far to say that Haydn’s concept of a new type of symphony as a "concerto grosso in symphonic form” brings out the wind instruments in such prominent and virtuoso manner, that a musical genre of the future is thus established: the sinfonia concertante.
Looking back to the past, anticipating whats to come: Haydn alternates constantly between these two strategies here. In the slow introduction of the first movement of Symphony no. 7, for example, he has recourse to tradition, with the pathetic and rhythmic spirit of an old French overture being conjured up; the programmatic introduction to the Sixth, on the other hand, brings a look ahead, with the sun rising in musical form as it was to do 37 years later in "The Creation". "La Tempesta", a musical depiction of a storm like that in Vivaldi's E flat major concerto op. 8/5, takes us back again to tradition, while the balanced chamber-music "conversation" in the andante of no. 8 once again anticipates what lies ahead. Here, Haydn creates the model of a "musical discourse", with formal sense of order and rhetoric nuances of expression counterbalancing each other in the manner that the philisophers of the Enlightenment - Lessing, Gottsched, Bodmer and Baumgartner - viewed as the principle of a new kind of art. The alternation of solo and tutti in all three symphonies is backward-looking in character, but the solo bassoon line (the trio in the minuet of no. 6), or the solo double-bass (in the trio of the minuet of no. 8) are clearly forward-looking. Likewise forward-looking is the fully-composed cadenza in the adagio of Symphony no. 7: here, Haydn no longer leaves the interplay of forces up to improvisation, but determines the relationship between thematic substance and playful décor himself. The traditional harmony and modulation plans are undoubtedly backward-looking, but harmonic attacks such as in bars 87-92 of the first movement of no. 7, where F major suddenly veers off into the remote key of B major, anticipate future evelopments. Ket's return once more to the rarity in the Symphony no. 7, the slow movement. Haydn (one is almost tempted to say: in bold anticipation of Scumann or Liszt) writes a "recitativo" in which the solo violin develops the ability to speak freely - what Schönberg was later to coin the term "musical prose" to describe. Haydn follows this with an instrumental aria, a vocal Konzertstück which he then rounds off in logical consistence with the above-mentioned written-out cadenza together with the orchestral closing formula that comes after it.
Operatic drama and operatic declamation: the 29-year-old deputy Kapellmeister at 
Eisenstadt even dares to try his hand on this as yet unfamiliar territory. Haydn cannot yet know Lessing's "Hamburgische Dramaturgie" of 1769, but he is already in the position to realise Lessing's innovatory demands:

"In vocal music the text offers far too much support to the espression... where-as this help is lacking in instrumental music. Here, then, the artist will have to employ his utmost strenght; he will only select from the sequences of notes able to express a feeling those that express it most clearly."

Let's take a curious example: at the opening of the adagio of Symphony no. 6, the strings (= a school class early in the morning?) play a G major scale and end up  on the wrong note, B flat; they are energetically corrected by the solo violin (the teacher?), which points out that last note should be B. An amusing little scene, depicted in music of the "utmost strength". Experimental music, then, at a point when new rules have not yet been drawn up. Haydn brings everything together that falls into his inquisitive hands: the old concerto principle and the new solo style of the symphony; the old minuet and the modern instrumental recitative; C. P. E. Bach's or Gluck's "fiery" style (compare the similarity between Don Juan's journey to Hell and the first movement of Symphony no. 7) and the Enlightenment manner of a balanced debate (cf. the andante of no. 8). Aged only 29, Haydn was lucky: he ended up in the right place at the right time, in the service of the right man. Prince Esterhãzy pushed the flexible young composer forwards and made him take heed of tradition at one and the same time. And with "his" new orchestra, Haydn had the right framework for experimenting. Capable soloists were a challenge that he responded to without hesitation. And thus it was that the year 1761 gave birth to experimental music: Haydn's lively mind found the new musical territory just as exciting as the old ground, and couldn't resist exploring, comparing, combining and synthesizing. That is the story that these three symphonies tell: the story of a model of musical progress that has lost none of its currency to the present day. In other
words: the right conditions tor experimenting have to exist, there has to be suitable “moterial” for experimenting on (and that includes trodition, of necessity), and of course a mind that loves to experiment - and is given scope to do so. Haydn had this sort of mind - and nothing does his boundless creative genius greater injustice than the cosy old image, full of prejudice and condescension, of “Papa Haydn”.

Hans-Christian Schmidt
Translation: Clive R. Williams

Nikolaus Harnoncourt (1929-2016)
Stampa la pagina
Stampa la pagina