|
2 DVD
- 003.2011 - (c) 2011
|
|
Bedřich Smetana
(1824-1884)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ma vlast (My
Fatherland) - Cicle of Symphonic Poems |
94' 00" |
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Višehrad |
|
|
DVD1-1 |
- Vltava (The Moldau) |
|
|
DVD1-2 |
- Šárka |
|
|
DVD1-3
|
- Z českých luhů a hájů (from Bohemia's Fields
and Groves) |
|
|
DVD1-4
|
- Tábor |
|
|
DVD1-5
|
- Blaník |
|
|
DVD1-6
|
|
|
|
|
BONUS: Making of "Má
vlast" - A documentary by Günter
Schilhan |
67' 00" |
|
DVD2
|
|
|
|
|
Chamber Orchestra
of Europe
|
|
Lorenza
Borrani, Violin (concert master) |
Luis
Zorita, Violoncello |
|
Sophie
Besançon, Violin |
Enno
Senft, Kontrabass |
|
Christian
Eisenberger, Violin |
Denton
Roberts, Kontrabass |
|
Lucy
Gould, Violin |
Lutz
Schumacher, Kontrabass |
|
Meesun
Hong, Violin |
Magali
Mosner, Flute |
|
Ulrika
Jansson, Violin |
Josine
Buter, Flute |
|
Matilda
Kaul, Violin |
Ricardo
Borrull, Flute |
|
Sylwia
Konopka, Violin |
Giorgi
Gvantseladze, Oboe |
|
Elissa
Lee, Violin |
Rachel
Frost, Oboe |
|
Stefano
Mollo, Violin |
Romain
Guyot, Clarinet |
|
Peter
Olofsson, Violin |
Manuel
Metzger, Clarinet |
|
Fredrik
Paulsson, Violin |
Ole
Kristian Dahl, Bassoon |
|
Joseph
Rappaport, Violin |
Christopher
Gunia, Bassoon |
|
Nina
Reddig, Violin |
Peter
Francomb, Horn |
|
Håkan
Rudner, Violin |
Elizabeth
Randell, Horn |
|
Aki
Saulière, Violin |
Jan
Harshagen, Horn |
|
Lisa
Schatzman, Violin |
Peter
Richards, Horn |
|
Gabrielle
Shek, Violin |
David
Tollington, Horn |
|
Martin
Walch, Violin |
Nicholas
Thompson, Trumpet |
|
Pascal
Siffert, Viola |
Julian
Poore, Trumpet |
|
Gert-Inge
Andersson, Viola |
Paul
Sharp, Trumpet |
|
Ida
Speyer Grøn, Viola |
Håkan
Björkman, Trombone |
|
Claudia
Hofert, Viola |
Nicholas
Eastop, Trombone |
|
Simone
Jandl, Viola |
Jen
Bjợrn-Larsen, Tuba |
|
Riika
Repo, Viola |
Dieter
Seiler, Timpani |
|
Dorle
Sommer, Viola |
David
Jackson, Percussion |
|
Howard
Penny, Violoncello |
Daniel
Piedl, Percussion |
|
Rafaeil
Bell, Violoncello |
Brian
Lewis, Harp |
|
Luise
Buchberger, Violoncello |
Gabriella
Dall'Olio, Harp |
|
Tomas
Djupsjöbacka, Violoncello |
|
|
|
|
Nikolaus
Harnoncourt, Conductor
|
|
Luogo e data
di registrazione
|
Helmut-List-Halle, Graz
(Austria) - giugno 2010 |
Registrazione
live / studio
|
live |
Producer / Engineer
|
Steirische
Kulturveranstaltungen GmbH |
Prima Edizione
CD
|
-
|
Prima
Edizione DVD
|
Styriarte - 001.2011 -
(2 DVD) - 94' 00" + 67' 00" - (c) 2011 -
NTSC - Stereo |
|
AD NOTAM
|
Countless
honorary titles have been bestowed upon
Bedřich Smetana’s cycle of
symphonic poems, Má
vlast. It has
been referred to as a reflection of the
Czech people’s past, their present and
their future and compared to the Song
of Solomon as a kind of Song
of Songs sung from the very soul
of a national people. Regardless of how
such monikers may be interpreted, they
can only paraphrase the unique
fascination these six poems have
inspired since their premiere in 1882.
MÁ
VLAST
FROM 1939 TO 1990
During Nazi occupation in
the Protectorate of Bohemia and Moravia,
programme authors were forbidden to
write more than one line explaining the
various symphonic poems making up
Smetana’s Má vlast. Anyone brave
enouvh to go into more
detail aid a heavy price. One such man
was Zdenĕk Nĕmec,
a music critic from Prague who was so
inspired by a performance of Má vlast
that he afterwards wrote of victorious
knights who would “arrive in the
Nation’s hour of need to break the bonds
of oppression and darkness.” Soon
afterwards Némec was arrested
by the Gestapo and “beaten to death like
a mangy dog because he dared to reveal
the hope which
Smetana had concealed in Má vlast
for every Czech to find” (Linda Maria
Koldau).
A few months before Némec’s
brutal murder, prisoners in the
concentration camp at Mauthausen near
Linz had the rare opportunity to
experience this same hope while
listening to a performance of Smetana’s
music. The SS camp commanders allowed a
commemorative celebration marking
Smetana’s 120th birthday
and the 60th anniversary
of his death and even allowed the camp
orchestra to put candles on their music
stands. “Within the
camp the prisoners were all just numbers
and the SS could extinguish each and
every one of them easier than the
candles flickering on the music stands,
but the splendour of this Smetana
celebration left even these tormented
souls speechless; tears flowed freely
down their sunken faces as the
orchestra, conducted by Rumbauer, played
the overture to Smetana’s The Kiss,
followed by a potpourri from The
Bartered Bride and finally rounded
off with Vltava. The celebration
was more than a success; it was a
manifestation of humanity and of an
unbreakable love for one’s homeland”
(Milan Kuna, Musik an der Grenze des
Lebens).
Whenever the Czech nation has been in
need of a symbol of her unity and her
will to survive, she has reached out for
Má vlast.
Smetana’s cycle of symphonic poems gave
the nation hope while under Austrian
rule in World War I,
throughout German occupation in World
War II and during and after the Velvet
Revolution of 1989/90. “During times of
vicious persecution, when politicians
were left unable to make any public
declarations and forms of artistic
expression, especially literature, were
fettered and constrained, Smetana’s
music was able to evade vigilant censors
who considered it to be merely a piece
of musical art. The poems, which thus
resounded as the only genuine, free
expression of the people’s sentiments,
garnered broad acclaim as more than just
something artistic and musical - so much
so that the Austrian authorities
eventually began to view Má
vlast as
something suspicious and treasonable”
(Zdenĕk Nejedlý,
1924).
Nikolaus Harnoncourt remembers the
legendary performance of Má
vlast conducted
by Rafael Kubelik at the opening of the
Prague Spring Festival in 1990, only a
few months after the fall of communism.
“I know that Rafael Kubelik -
really one of the nicest conductors I
have ever met -
conducted Má vlast just
as Czechoslovakia had shed itself of the
communist yoke. He returned to conduct
his Czech Philharmonic in honour of this
political occasion. The music of Má
vlast was so
much a part of him that he never even
needed the score. He conducted the
entire piece from memory, although he
hadn’t performed it in years. He came
back and conducted it as though it was
something he had done every day of his
life”, recalls Harnoncourt. Kubelik had
previously conducted Má
vlast on 12
May 1946, the anniversary of Smetana’s
death, which was the first performance
of the piece in Prague after the
liberation from German occupation. Since
then, every Prague Spring Festival
commences with a performance of
Smetana’s symphonic poems. Extracts of
the piece are also found in Czech
day-to-day life, with the Czech
broadcasting company using Vyšehrad
as an interval signal and the bells of
the Basilica of St Peter and St Paul
chiming the melody to Vltava.
MÁ
VLAST - A RARITY
While conducting some of
the world’s most renowned orchestras,
Nikolaus Harnoncourt has come to realize
that Má vlast played in its
entirety is not a familiar piece for
many. It is performed so seldom that it
is in little danger of becoming kitsch.
“When I was conducting the piece in
Holland, it was the first time the Royal
Concertgebouw Orchestra had performed it
in twenty years,” he remembers. “They
were completely surprised. Some former
orchestra members were there and said
they had played it twenty years before
with Dorati. And the Vienna Philharmonic
hadn’t performed the entire piece since
James Levine’s day,
which had been many years before - where
is the kitsch in that? It is actually
not a sunny piece at all but rather a
veiled horror. Even From Bohemia's
woods and fields is a bit
horrific. It starts with a sunny
atmosphere but then you start to ask
yourself, ‘Is this really beautiful?'
It’s always interrupted with something
horrific. I suppose Vltava could
probably be made kitschy but I would
never even think of finding the piece
itself kitschy. There is something
sublime about it but that is quite
natural, the sense of home it evokes. I
don't know whether there is a country or
a people or ethnic group anywhere in the
world, be they ever so small, which does
not develop a certain enthusiasm for its
own uniqueness. I think that this
feeling exists everywhere, from the
smallest to the largest cultural
groups.”
Harnoncourt goes on to remark that “as
far as the tone painting is concerned,
there is nothing superficial or kitschy
about the piece. Ok, the scenes in Vltava
with the nymphs and the dancing are
quite clear and obvious. But Šárka
is a complicated story. Do we really
know what she is discussing with her
maidens? She calls out for help and the
knights arrive, and then she summons her
maidens with a hunting horn and they
come armed with weapons and in the end
she regrets that it is too late to
prevent the massacre. The men lie drunk
out of their wits on the ground and are
butchered, all the men of Bohemia.”
“I spent quite a lot of time researching
and talking to Czech people and reading
everything I could find about the piece
including material on the stories
surrounding Tábor and
Blaník. To understand them
you have to understand the Hussite
chorale, the entire Hussite movement,
what they stood for and what they
opposed, that the Hussite knights, with
their strong faith, disappeared into a
mountain to await the time when they
would awaken to rescue the entire world.
The ‘entire world’ here being Bohemia.”
HISTORY,
STORIES, PROGRAMME
Smetana composed his six
symphonic poems in just under five
years. At first it seemed he would
confine his piece to a tetralogy. Vyšehrad
and Vltava were completed
towards the end of 1874 and Šárka,
and From Bohemia's woods and
fields in the autumn
of 1875. It was not until 1878 that
Smetana resumed his work and composed Tábor
and Blaník,
which he completed in just a few months.
These two pieces were based on the
images of resistance and triumph which
unfurl in the Hussite chorale. The motif
found in Vyšehrad serves
as the piece’s motto as it is a
recurring theme throughout the entire
cycle, making itself known in Vltava
and at the end of Blaník.
On 5 November 1882, Má vlast
was performed in Prague in its entirety
for the first time and
frantically celebrated as a resounding
symbol of the nation. Otakar Hostinský
wrote of the performance: “After Vltava,
a real hurricane of excitement broke
loose ... and the same storm of applause
was repeated after each of the six parts
of the cycle. The audience listened with
growing enthusiasm up to the very last
chord ... After the clashing sounds in Blaník,
the listeners were beside themselves and
couldn’t bring themselves to take leave
of Smetana, who, though he had not been
able to hear a single note of his own
work, was still pleased to know that he
had delighted others.” Smetana, who had
been completely deaf since the completion
of Vltava in 1874, was never
able to listen to his most famous work
in its entirety. His enthusiasm for the
material he dealt with in his music,
however, never waned. Bohemia was slowly
breaking away from Vienna’s paternalism
and starting to emerge as a confident
nation and Smetana wanted to give his
fellow Czechs a musical apotheosis of
their most important myths and beautiful
landscape.
Smetana’s musical landscape painting is
also understandable for listeners
outside of Czechia, which is why Vltava
and From Bohemia's woods and fields
have become the cycle’s most popular
pieces with international audiences. The
remaining four symphonic poems, however,
elude listeners not familiar with
Bohemia’s history. For hundreds of
years, the ruins of a powerful
stronghold loomed atop Vyšehrad,
a steep rock towering over the Vltava
river and which today makes up part of
the city of Prague. It was a monument to
the erstwhile greatness of medieval
Czech rulers, who had been displaced by
the House of Habsburg. The bloody story
of Šárka
belongs to the saga surrounding the Maidens’
War; the gruesome war between
women warriors led by Vlasta against
male knights. The city of Tábor
in Southern Bohemia was founded in 1420
by a radical group of Hussites,
forerunners of the protestant movement
in Bohemia and who followed the
teachings of Jan Hus.
These men believed themselves to be holy
warriors but were eventually defeated by
the imperial army and the moderate
Bohemians. It is this event that Smetana
interprets in Tábor,
which leans on the Hussite chorale Ye
Who Are The Warriors Of God. He
makes use of this same material once
more in the incomparably ecstatic finale
of Blaník, named after a
mountain not far from Tábor.
According to legend, Blaník
is the resting place of the defeated
Hussite knights, who, in the nation’s
greatest hour of need, will once more
ride forth to her aid.
Each of the six pieces has two official
programmes. The first is a short
programme which was written
by Smetana himself and sent to his
publisher, Urbánek, in
1879. The second, which quotes and
explains short passages from the
original, is more detailed. Václav
Zelený published this second,
poetically embellished programme in the
periodical Dalibor in 1882 with
the composer’s consent.
Josef
Beheimb
(Translation: Melissa
Kercher)
|
|
Nikolaus
Harnoncourt (1929-2016)
|
|
|
|