|
12
dischi a 78 rpm - (p) 1953
|
 |
1 CD -
CD 379 - (c) 2004 |
 |
2 CD -
SU 4213-2 - (p) 1953 (c) 2016 |
|
Johann
Sebastian Bach (1685-1750)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BRANDENBURG
CONCERTOS, BWV 1046-1051
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Concerto
No. 1 in F major, BWV 1046 |
|
23' 28" |
|
- (without tempo indication) |
4' 30" |
|
CD1-1
|
- Adagio
|
3' 46" |
|
CD1-2
|
- Allegro |
5' 09" |
|
CD1-3
|
- Menuetto - Trio I - Polacca
- Trio II
|
9' 54" |
|
|
Concerto
No. 2 in F major, BWV 1047 |
|
12' 03" |
|
- (without tempo indication) |
5' 16" |
|
CD1-4
|
- Andante |
3' 41" |
|
CD1-5
|
- Allegro assai |
3' 00" |
|
CD1-6
|
Concerto No. 3 in G major,
BWV 1048 |
|
12' 46" |
|
- (without tempo indication) |
6' 40" |
|
CD1-7
|
- Allegro
|
6' 07" |
|
CD1-8
|
Concerto No. 4 in G major,
BWV 1049 |
|
19' 02" |
|
- Allegro |
8' 05" |
|
CD2-1
|
- Andante |
4' 40" |
|
CD2-2
|
- Presto |
6' 08" |
|
CD2-3
|
Concerto No. 5 in D
major, BWV 1050 |
|
22' 43" |
|
- Allegro |
11' 09" |
|
CD2-4
|
- Affettuoso |
5' 21" |
|
CD2-5
|
- Allegro |
6' 03" |
|
CD2-6
|
Concerto No. 6 in B flat
major, BWV 1051 |
|
17' 19" |
|
- (without tempo indication) |
6' 36" |
|
CD2-7
|
- Adagio, ma non tanto |
4' 33" |
|
CD2-8
|
- Allegro |
6' 02" |
|
CD2-9
|
|
|
|
|
Members of the
WIENER KAMMERORCHESTER and guests
|
|
-
Edith Steinbauer, violin, leader,
viola (2nd viola in No.6)
|
-
Elisabeth Schaeftlein, recorder
|
|
-
Alfred Altenburger, violin |
-
Jürg Schaeftlein, recorder, oboe
|
|
-
Alice Hoffelner (Harnoncourt),
violin |
-
Camillo Wanausek, flute
|
|
-
Eduard Melkus, viola (1st viola
in No.6)
|
-
Helmut Wobisch, trumpet
|
|
-
Nikolaus Harnoncourt,
violoncello, viola da gamba? |
-
Bruno Seidlhofer, harpsichord
(solo in No.5) |
|
-
Frida (Krause) Litschauer,
violoncello
|
-
and others
|
|
-
Gustav Leonhardt, viola da gamba
|
|
|
|
|
Josef Mertin,
conductor |
|
Luogo e data
di registrazione
|
Casino Baumgarten, Linzer
Strasse, Vienna (Austria) - 1950 |
Registrazione
live / studio
|
studio |
Producer / Engineer
|
Bernhard Trebuch / Karl
Wolleitner (ORF) - Matouš Vlčinský /
Karl Wolleitner (Supraphon)
|
Prima Edizione
CD
|
- ORF
"Alte Musik" - CD 379 - (1 cd) -
48' 43" - (p) & (c) 2004 - AAD
mono (BWV 1048, 1049 e 1051)
- Supraphon -
SU 4213-2 - (2 cd) - 48' 41" + 59' 27" -
(p) 1953 (c) 2016 - AAD mono (BWV
1046-1051)
|
Prima
Edizione LP
|
Supraphon - 23291/23302 - (12
dischi, 24 facciate, 78 rpm) - durata
48' 43" + 59' 22" - (p) 1953 - mono |
Nota
|
The FIRST recording with
period instruments.
Special thanks to Alice Harnoncourt,
Ingomar Rainer and Robert
Wolf for the information on the
recording and the members of the
ensemble.
|
|
Notes (CD
Supraphon
SU 4213-2)
|
On
Josef Mertin's
recordings of the
Brandenburg
Concertos
When, in
1950, post-war Europe,
whose political and
cultural scene had
been mercilessly
divided by the Iron
Curtain, was
commemorating the
200th anniversary of
the death of Johann
Sebastian Bach
(1685-1750), the
festivities were borne
in the spirit of
numerous symbolic
connotations. They
were aimed at
re-embracing the most
valuable assets of
conflict-debased
German art, as well as
celebrating Bach’s
universally
comprehensible musical
language. The
festivities were
particularly vigorous
in war-ravaged,
divided Germany and
neighbouring Austria,
whose music centres of
Salzburg and Vienna
saw the Bach
anniversary as am
opportunity to hold
numerous commemorative
events and concerts.
The Bach jubilee was
not overlooked by the
Czechoslovak music
publisher Supraphon,
which duly implemented
a project that would
have no parallel in
the country in the
years to follow.
Making the best of the
composer’s
anniversary, the
company utilised the
repertoire in the
record catalogue, the
post-war availability
of fledgling Viennese
artists and its
contacts with the
musical circles in the
Austrian capital. In
the 1950s. Supraphon
produced a host of
remarkable recordings,
primarily featuring
core Czech
19th- and 20th-century
music, with many of
them catching the
attention of critics
and discerning
listeners abroad. From
the late 1950s,
Supraphon’s success
was increased in part
owing to the
engagement of renowned
foreign conductors and
instrumentalists,
including those
hailing from beyond
the Eastern bloc (John
Barbirolli, Jean Fournet,
Antonio Pedrotti, and
others). Nevertheless,
at the time, none of
the state publisher’s
projects
came into being
outside the country,
and without the
participation of
Czechoslovak artists,
as had been the case
of the recording of
Bach’s Brandenburg
Concertos, BWV 1046-1051
(1718-1721), made in
Vienna in 1950.
The
history of the album
started in the heart
of the Broumov
Promontory in the
northeast of Bohemia
by the Czech-Polish
(until 1945,
Czech-German) border.
In
March 1904, Josef
Mertin (b.
21.3.1904 Broumov, d.
16.2.1998 Vienna) was
born into a German
family living next to
the Benedictine
Monastery. Following
his graduation from
the local grammar
school, where he had
received thorough
training in singing,
the violin, piano and
organ, and a brief
spell as a music
teacher in his remote
native town
(1922-1925), in 1925
he received a
scholarship from the
company Benedikt
Schroll’s Sohn and
moved to Vienna in
order to study voice
and sacred music at
the Wiener
Musikakademie. While
in the Austrian
capital, in 1927 and
1928 he formed a
chamber orchestra and
passed exams in church
music and pedagogy,
and in 1928 he
graduated as
Kapellmeister from the
Neues Wiener
Konservatorium. Mertin
concurrently attended
musicology seminars at
the Universität
Wien. In
1928, at the age of
24, he made his debut
with the Wiener
Kammerorchestervereinigung;
from 1932 he conducted
Hans Gál’s
Madrigalchor
(1890-1987);
and in 1933 he founded
his own instrumental
ensemble, Collegium
musicum Wiener
Musikakademie.
At the
end ofthe 1920s and
the beginning of the
1930s, in addition to
new contemporary music
and Bach pieces (the Saint
Matthew Passion,
on period
instruments), Mertin
also performed
compositions by
Guillaume de Machaut
(c. 1300-1377), whose
moderntiine premieres
in Vienna caused quite
a stir, as well as by
his beloved Heinrich
Schütz.
He taught at the
Kapellmeisterschule
and the Neues Wiener
Konservatorium
(1928-1938), the
Wiener Volskhochschule
(1932-1938), and at
the Musikakademie
(1937-1938). In
1950 he left the
Konservatorium der
Stadt Wien so as to
continue teaching at
the Musikakademie
(1946-1978) and organ
restoring (from 1931
he worked at the
Federal Monuments
Office), to carry out
research into the
building of historical
musical instruments
and put together a
collection of early
instruments at the
Kunsthistorisches
Museum in Vienna.
Evidently the most
intriguing of his
activities were
Mertin’s experimental
early music
performances at the
Hofburgkapelle and the
Albertina gallery
(from 1934, he held
his own concert series
at the Festsaal der
Graphischen Sammlung
der Albertina). His
achievements in the
domains of music,
education,
organisation.
restoration and
collecting earned him
the title of
Professor, the Cross
of Honour for Science
and Art (1960), the
Gold Medal of Merit
for the University of
Music and Performing
Arts in Vienna (1989),
and the Silver Medal
of Merit of the
Republic of Austria
(1994).
Before
Josef Mertin died at
the age of 93, he
could not only look
back fondly at his
long life filled with
music and pioneering
work focused on its
early stylistic
periods, he was also
able to observe with
pride the progress of
his numerous pupils
(Claudio Abbado,
Mariss Jansons, Zubin
Mehta, and others),
many of whom had been
enticed by his
unconventional
teaching methods and
imbued with a
passionate ardour for
early music. The New
Testament’s "For
many are called, but
few are chosen"
(Matthew 22:14) also
applied to Mertin’s
students, the majority
of whom could only put
up with his not overly
systematic educational
methods for a few
lessons. Yet those who
did remain faithful to
Mertin’s apostolic
verve and rccondite
pedagogic techniques
embraced performance
of early music on
period instruments and
copies in the post-war
decades so fiercely
that they almost
condemned their
teacher's
name to becoming a
mere encyclopaedia
entry. The most gifted
of Mertin’s pupils in
the late 1940s
included the Austrian
violinist Eduard
Melkus (b.
1.9.1928 in Baden an
Wien), who in 1946
assumed the post of
concert master of
Mertin’s Collegium
musicum and served his
teacher as a faithful
and practical guide
through the
vieissitudes of the
music scene in Vienna
(from 1951 to 1953, he
studied in Switzerland
with the Vienna-born
violinist of Czech
origin Petr Rybář,
a friend of Bohuslav
Martinů).
Melkus also followed
in Mertin’s footsteps
by founding early-music
ensembles, Schola
antiqua Wien (1952)
and Capella academica
Wien (1965), and
finally, as a
professor of the
violin, viola, Baroque
violin and
historically informed
early-music
performance at the
Universität
für
Musik und darstellende
Kunst Wien
(1958-1996).
When in
the autumn of 1950,
following years spent
at the Schola
cantoruin basiliensis
in Basel (1947-1950),
the gifted Dutch
organist and
harpsichordist Gustav
Leonhardt (1928-2012)
arrived in Vienna to
study musicology, he
immediately joined
Mertin’s early-music
seminar attended by a
number of antagonistic
talents. Mertin’s
students also included
the gifted recorder
player Elisabeth-Liesel
Schaeftlein
(1927-1993), a Graz
native and sister of Jürg
Schaeftlein
(1929-1986), the
legendary oboist of
Concentus musicus Wien
(1953). Probably in
1948, she introduced
to Mertin
and his disciple
Melkus her gangly
compatriot Nikolaus
Harnoncourt
(1929-2016), who from
1948 studied the cello
with Emanuel Brabec at
the Musikakademie. Had
Elisabeth-Liesel
Schaeftlein not done
so, the young Harnoncourt
would most likely have
pursued the path of a
solo instrumentalist,
or “just” a player of
the Wiener
Philharmoniker,
performing Dvořák’s
and Strauss’s music,
instead of becoming
one of the major
figures of
historically informed
early music
performance of the
second half of the
20th century. Had it
not been for
Elisabeth-Liesel
Schaeftlein, in 1950
Mertin’s student team,
extended for the sake
of the imminent
recording of the Brandenburg
Concertos with a
group of players of
the Kammerorchester
of the Wiener
Konzerthausgesellschaft,
who for its time and
in comparison with
other Viennese
orchestras had an
unusually high
proportion of female
members, would have
had to do without the
cellist Harnoncourt.
The
talented recorder
student
Elisabeth-Liesel
Schaeftlein, the
rising violin star
Eduard Melkus, the
hitherto unknown
cellist Nikolaus
Harnoncourt and the
subtle Gustav
Leonhardt, in the
company of members of
the Wiener
Kammerorchester (l
946), got together in
the studio to make
under the guidance of
Melkus a
groundbreaking album
of the Brandenburg
Concertos. The
project had been
preceded by the
complete recordings
made by Alfred Cortot
(1932, Orchestre de
l’Ecole Normale de
Musique) and Adolf
Busch (1936, Adolf
Busch Chamber
Players), as well as
accounts of individual
pieces, including, for
instance, Wilhelm Furtwängler’s
live recordings of Brandenburg
Concertos
Nos. 3 and 5 with
the Wiener
Philharrnoniker at the
Salzburger Festspiele
in 1950. Yet, some two
centuries after Bach’s
death, Josef Mertin
decided to take a revolutionary
step and perform the
flagship work
- a "showcase
of the composer's
instrumental
mastery" (N.
Harnoncourt)
- in a chamber
formation, making
use of the
instruments and
applying the
performance canon of
Bach’s own time. "within the
Baroque concerto
genre, the concertos
represent an
ultimate apex;
with regard to the
instrumentation,
they are true
chamber music,
unveiling their
value in the more
intimate milieu in
which they were
formerly performed
too. Your
gramophone
recording (with
its most natural
use being for
personal listening
in a private
circle) thus
complies with the
essential trait of this
music," Mertin
wrote to Supraphon
after listening to
the recordings that
were being
completed.
A number of the
period instmments
employed in Mertin`s
recording of the Brandenburg
Concertos were
from his own
collection, which
was also made use of
by the members of
the Wiener
Gamben-Quartett
(1949): Melkus,
Harnoncourt, Alfred
Altenburger
(1927-2015) and Alice
Hoffelner (b.
26.9.1930),
who would marry
Harnoncourt
in 1953. Instruments
from the collection
were also used by
Gustav Leonhardt,
who in Mertin’s
recording of the Brandenburg
Concertos
played the viola da
gamba (Brandenburg
Concerto No. 6 in
B flat major).
By the way, the
collection and an
organ built by Mertin
himself (organo di
legno) were
indispensable in the
making of the
generally
better-known 1954
radio recording by
Paul Hindemith of
Claudio Monteverdi’s
opera L'Orfeo,
performed by Melkus
and the oldest
generation of the
then not yet named
historical
instruments ensemble
Concentus musicus
Wien, helmed by
Harnoncourt.
In
addition to the
minimalist
configuration, made
up of students of
Mertin’s early music
performance class
and the members of
die Wiener
Kammerorchester,
headed by the
concert master Edith
Steinbauer
(1901-1996) and the
cellist Frieda
Litschauer-Krause
(1903-1992), the
wife of the
orchestra’s founder,
another natural
facet of the
pioneering 1950
recording was the
adherence to the
original
instrumental
structure of Bach`s
Kothen orchestra,
including two
recorders in the
fourth concerto,
which up until the
1970s
were commonly
replaced with
traverse flutes.
Specific information
about the
instruments played
in the individual Brandenburg
Concertos has
not been preserved,
nor has the date on
which the album was
made. Yet Mertin’s
studio recording is
more than a mere
sonic document of a
revolutionary moment
in the history of
performing early
music on modern and
period instruments.
Compared to the
later projects of
Viennese provenience -
Jascha Horenstein’s,
implemented in
September 1954,
using historical
instruments
(performed by
Nikolaus Harnoncourt
and members of
Concentus musicus
Wien), and the 1957
recording of Felix
Prohaska conducting
the members of the
Kammerorehester der
Wiener Staatsoper -
Mertin’s account
stands out owing to
his endeavour for
the utmost sonic
transparency and
precise leading of
the instrument
parts. Mertin also
gave great thought
to the tempos. Even
though Horenstein
opted for markedly
faster tempos. Mertin’s
account is
strikingly akin to
the first of the
series of
Harnoncourt’s
recordings of the Brandenburg
Concertos
(1964, 1981/1983,
1982). Mertin’s
dismissive attitude
to the romanticising
conception of Bach’s
orchestral concertos
is boldly audible in
comparison with
Furtwängler’s
1950 album: Whereas
Furtwängler
himself played the
piano on Brandenburg
Concerto No. 5 in
D major
(29:23), Mertin
invited to perform
on the harpsichord
the technically
superlative Bruno
Seidlhofer
(1905-1982) (22:38).
Furtwängler
turned Bach’s
work into a Classicist-Romantic
piano concerto,
while Mertin
returned to the
dialogical character
of the Baroque
concerto.
"]osef Mertin was
the father of all
the endeavours to
purge Romantic and
Baroque music of
romantic deposits
and comfortable
tradition,"
the conductor Milan
Turković,
bassoonist of
Concentus musicus
Wien, wrote years
later. And bearing
cogent witness to
this is even the
oldest of Mertin’s
(precious few
preserved) studio
recordings,
surprisingly made by
the Czechoslovak
label Supraphon. For
the first time since
its lirst release,
on 12 shellac discs,
in 1953, Mertin’s
complete account (to
whose final
recording the
(self-) critical
Mertin took
exception and,
following the
recording’s
completion, he even
offered to make for
Supraphon new
recordings, this
time only with
Collegium musicum)
is now being
presented to
listeners on CD (in
2004, the year
marking the
centenary of Josef Mertin’s
birth and the 75th
birthday of Nikolaus
Harnoncourt,
Austria’s ORF radio
station
released a selection
of the Brandenburg
Concertos Nos. 3,
4 and 6).
Thus, after an
interval of 66
years, music lovers
are offered Mertin’s
historically first
recording of the Brandenburg
Concertos in
their entirety, as
performed by his
ensemble on modern
and period
instruments. The
project serves to
pay tribute to
Mertin's
visionary approach
and express
admiration for his
followers, headed by
Nikolaus
Harnoncourt. The
present unique album
is also a proud
reminder of their
Czech connections.
Martin
Jemelka
Translation:
Hilda Hearne
----------
Major birthdays are often very
welcome affairs. In this case,
they provide a suitable occasion
to celebrate two anniversaries,
Josef Mertin's 1ooth and
Nikolaus Harnoncourt 75th, whose
first gramophone recording
appears on the present edition.
Of course I realise theat Josef
Mertin (one of the most modest
peole I have known) would not
have considered this a real
reason to re-issue an historic
recording, least of all one of
his own.
Maybe his description of the
circumstances of this 1950
recording as a "scating over
thin ice" is somewhat
exaggerated, yet it does
represent a memorable step in
the early music revival.
It was prompted by a search for
musical authenticity in the 1950
Bach year.
Matters that seem self-evident
to us today, such as the use of
recorders in the 4th concerto
(until the 1970's the use of
flutes was still customary), the
two viola da ganbas in the 6th
or the chamber.music scoring of
Bach's "Six Concerts Avec
plusieurs Instruments"
were real pioneer events in
1950.
The appearance of Eduard Melkus
and of Gustav Leonhardt, who
taught harpsichord in the 50's
at the Vienna Music Academy, as
gambist in the 6th concerto only
add to the artistic value of the
production.
As with the restoration of
historic instruments, greatest
care was taken with the
production of this re-issue. The
goal was not to reproduce the
original sound (almost
impossible anyway) but, in
favour of a wider sound
spectrum, to document the
condition of the original
shellac discs in 2004. Sound
filters were threfore used only
seldom and then extremely
sparingly, and it was decided
not to put movements together
(akthough this would have been
quite possible) which had been
split up due to the limited
playing time of the discs.
I hope that this recording from
a time far.removed from ours may
not only remind us that musical
interpretations should always be
heard and judged in the context
of their times, but far more
serve to commemorate a
full-blooded musician who, until
late in life, tirelessly trained
and influenced several
generations of students
(including myself), a "homo
faber" archetype who
contributedvsignificantly to the
burgeoning of early music, a
warm-hearted, caring, modest and
very humane person, Josef
Mertin!
Althofen,
December 6th, 2004
Bernhard
Trebuch
|
Notes (CD
ORF
379) |
This edition consists of
a transfer onto CD of 12 shellac 78 rpm
discs made by Supraphon in Prague
containing three of six Brandenburg
concertos by Johann Sebastian Bach. The
label on the discs attributes the
recording to "Members of the Chamber
Orchestra of Vienna" conducted by Josef
Mertin and recorded in 1950. A
few explanations, amendments and
corrections are required concerning both
the time and circumstances of the
recording and also those taking part.
The early music and authentic sound
movement in Austria in the twentieth
century is closely bound up with the
name of Josef Mertin (1904-1998) who,
until the sixties and seventies, was
considered one of its most important
instigators and mentors. Born in Braunau
in Bohemia (now part of the Czech
Republic), Mertin arrived in Vienna in
the twenties to study music. He
completed his studies within a very
short period (1925-28) with diplomas in
church music, voice and conducting from
the then State Academy and the so-called
New Conservatory. In addition, he
attended lectures on musicology given by
Guido Adler and Rudolf von Ficker at the
university. His experience of Ficker's
combination of scholarship and musical
practice, togheter with the knowledge
and skill he soon acquired in
instrument-making, did much to mark
Mertin's later work as musician, teacher
and maker.
Numerous concerts and church music
activities during the thirties in the
field of youth music-making and organ
playing (with the associated rediscovery
pf pre-Bach music which saw the
beginning of Mertin's lifelong
dedication to Heinrich Schütz) were
interspersed with the first occasional
attempts to use historic instruments.
This was to be continued after the war
at the Collegium musicum of the Vienna
Music Academy, where Mertin confronted
an international body og
highly-qualified students with questions
concernin the interpretation of early
music, inspiring them to their own
exploration, as he liked to call it,
which was to spread his exemplary
impetus throughout the world.
These recordings date from this period
shortly after the war. An (unfortunately
undated) copy of a letter
(Mertin-Archiv, Universität für Musik
und darstellende Kunst in Wien) from the
professor to the "management of the
Supraphon Record Company, Prague"
provides valuable documentation about
the circumstances as well as Mertin's
own particular views of the recording, a
"personal statement and assessment of
the recentlz-completed recording of
Bachßs Brandenburg concertos".
Mertin assumes that the necessarily "different
nature", even "apparent lack of
uniformity" in the sound
world of each pieces is inherent to
their differing instrumentation and
design (he discusses only concertos III,
IV and VI which he apparently received
as test pressings) and thus found the
very different sounds of the individual
recordings acceptable. However there
were other serious problems, also
concerning the editing and other
technical aspects of the recording,
about which Mertin did notwithhold his
criticism: "The test tape... sounded
much more faithful than the finisched
disc. In my opinion some important
elements in the sound have disappeared
in the cutting (Frequency range
relationships and balance altered)."
The producer was Mertin's friend and
colleague Karl Wolleitner (1919-2004)
working, according to our research, in
the so-called "Casino Baumgarten" on the
Linzer Strasse in Vienna's Penzing
district. The processing of the material
however took place entirely at the
Prague factory. The criticism continue
in concrete detail: "The 3rd concerto
has the most satisfactory 'sound',
since the performers all belong to a
group used to playing together and the
concerto iteself presents the least
problems in terms of sound. As a
recording it is a technical success,
since the composition's design can be
clearly heard. The concerto has only
one dynamic distorsion... the violins
are unreasonably favoured by their
closer position to the microphone. The
record is good."
"Recorders are added to the strings
in the 4th concerto. These are real
historic instruments, and on top of
that, in the hands of wind players
with particular stylistic experience.
This puts the quasi-modern string
sound at a disadvantage, lending it an
unflatteringly penetrating quality."
However, all in all the recording is "well-worth
listening to, and of a
higher quality than other records of
this piece up till now."
Matters start to worsen with the
assessment of the final concerto,
apparently recorded in winter (February
1950?): "The recording [of
Concerto VI Ed.] suffered from the
heasting failure and contains more
faulty notes than acceptable even
under the circumstances." (sic!)
In this context, Mertin addresses a
foundamental problem and handicap to the
whole production: "The Wiener Kammerorchester'
was booked for the recording... this
orchestra is not an ensemble
specialised in early music, although
highly-regarded in Vienna and working
with care and devotion. The orchestra
semply plays in the same standard and
exemplary way as the Philharmonic etc.
are used to playing. But they are not
early music 'specialiss', and as a
result certain stulistic wishes cannot
be fulfilled with this ensemble. The
6th concerto suffers particularly in
this respect... with these players...
a new recording would probably not
produce significantly better results."
A possible alternative was offered: "With
my Collegium musicusm as the Vienna
State Academy (where the recorders
come from!) I have built up an
ensemble that plays on actual historic
instruments." String instruments
restored to their original form are
meant here, subsequently referred to as
"short-necked violins", which
proved more suitable to the demands,
since "a whole host of problems which
otherwise hinder the performance of
early music disappear with the use of
instruments in their original state."
This stylistic approach of the whole
performance is very reminiscent today of
Paul Hindemithìs surviving recordings of
his own works such as the Concerto for
Orchestra op.38 and similar pieces fron
the same period. Mertin's Bach
interpretations also owe something to
the neo-baroque and new objectivity in
the result of his effort to cleanse and
de-romanticise Bach, to reveal the
compositional steucture. Indeed
Hindemith and Mertin worked closely
together on the 1954 Vienna performance
of Monteverdi's "Orfeo" which so
impressed the young Harnoncourt and for
which Mertin provided a specially-made
"organo di legno".
Meanwhile, the stimulos and occasions to
become involved with so-called period
instruments in Vienna came most of all
from Othmar Steinbauer (1895-1962),
himself a violin student of Sevcik who,
rejecting the excessive,
highly-individual romantic string sound
as understood by the Hauer circle,
preferred "old" instruments (even
including the pseudo-Middle Age vielle
newly-designed from iconographic models
but with modern tuning in fifrhs). The
Vienna Gamba Quartet also made its mark
in this field of activity during the
1950 Bach year with a sensational
arrangement of the Art of Fugue
(including a completion of the closing
fugue by Eduard Melkus which remains
exemplary today). Its four members,
Alfred Altenburger, Alice Hoffelner,
Eduard Melkus and Nikolaus Harnoncourt,
who were all closey associated with
Mertin's Collegium, played on adapted
viola d'amore instruments tuned in
fifths, with the bass gamba being the
only instrument we would consider
historic today.
All this led to the suggestion in a
letter for a re-recording of the sixth
concerto with "new soloist: 1a viola:
my best pupil at the Academy with an
original Quinton, 2nd viola: Prof.
Steimbauer on an original old Viennese
master viola; both instruments played
with historic viol bows! 1st gamba, ny
best Academy gamba-player on an
original instrument using historic
bowing style. 2nd gamba: ditto:
also an outstanding pupil."
Further names included the cellist
Frieda Krause-Litschauer, Bruno
Seidlhofer on the harpsichord and an
unnamed double-bass player from the
Philharmonic, also with an original
instrument. Mertin requested that the
additional recording sessions be
organised quickly: "The students with
whom I could make this
stylistically faithful recording have
already graduated and are only
available until May."
He mentions that one has got a job in a
"top-rank Swiss orchestra...
one gentleman is going
back to France, another to Holland".
This sets definite time limits as well
as giving some indications about the
partecipants in the recording. Nikolaus
Harnoncourt was among them, wherther on
the gamba as mentioned above or wherther
on the cello instead of Frieda
Litschauer is no longer certain, as was
Gustav Leonhardt, an excellent
gamba-player in addition to being a
performer on historic keyboard
instruments. He had made his Vienna
debut in 1950 as harpsichordist and
taught at the Music academy from 1952
before taking up his position at the
Amsterdam conservatory in 1954. No doubt
he was the gentleman referred to in
Mertinìs letter who must return to
Holland. In the same year Eduard Melkus
("my best pupil at the Academy"
almost certainly refers to "the
baroquest violinist" according to
Hindemith's famous dictum) took up a
solo viola position in the Zurich
Tonhalle orchestra, the "top-rank
Swiss orchestra" mentioned above.
Thus the earliest recording date for the
6th concerto was to be in the spring of
1954, and it includes the "youthful
work" of a few players who were
later to become some of the best
performers on the scene!
We may now reconstruct the definitive
list of those taking part as follows:
Edith Steinbauer (1901-1996), leader as
well as soloist in no. 4 and second
viola in no.6. Eduard Melkus, viola,
also as soloist in no. 6. Nikolaus
Harnoncourt possibly as cellist in no.
6, but perhaps on one of the gambas.
(That Harnoncourt and very probably also
his future wife, Alice Hoffelner, were
members of the orchestra can also be
confirmed by the listing of the complete
recording as quasi opus 1 in his
official discography.) The stylistically
expert recorder players in the 4th
concerto were brother and sister Jürg
(1929-1986) and Elisabeth (1930-1993)
Schaeftlein, the former soon to become a
long-serving member and leading light of
Concentus Musicus Wien as baroque
oboist. It goes without saying that the
recorders they used also had nothing in
common with authentic instruments in the
strictest sense. Finally, Bruno
Seidlhofer (1905-1982), later a renowned
piano teacher, is listed as playing
harpsicord continuo.
"The ensemble mentioned here
would also have been better for the
remaining 5th concerto..."
During conversations in later years
Mertin candidly described a recording of
the 5th Brandenburg (with Bruno
Seidlhofer as soloist), clearly made at
the same time, as "entirely unusuable";
it never gor beyond the test pressing,
which is also why we have chosen to
ignore it in the context of this
re-issue. Apparently Hindemith attempted
to direct a recording of the second
concerto with the same team (with Helmut
Wonisch playing trumpet alongside
Elisabeth Schaeftlein on the recorder).
A recording of the first concerto never
seems to have been attempted.
In an introductory text to a production
of all six concertos (and thus not
directly for this edition) containing
much other useful information Josef
Mertin also expresses an interesting
thought about his own, carefully
considered relationship to the recording
medium: "The concertos represent an
absolute pinnacle of achievement in
the genre of the baroque concerto;
their instrumentation in like
true chamber music, whose value is
best revealed in intimate surroundings
such as those in which they were forst
performed. Hnece their appearance on
record (assuming the most natural use
of the record for personal purposes in
intimate surroundings) corresponds to
an important characteristic of
this music."
May this commemorative re-issue of his
production of the Brandenburg concertos
be granted a suitable affectionate
treatment "for personal purposes in
intimate surroundings"!
Ingomar Rainer
|
|
Nikolaus
Harnoncourt (1929-2016)
|
|
|
|